Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association: botability rankings

Botability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 14 Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 14
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Showing Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites. All education sites

Members of the Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

A 93

Average botability score of 12 fully scanned Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites

5th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average botability score

12 of 14

Mid-america intercollegiate athletics association member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades

B 89

Average botability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association botability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 12 fully scanned Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

  • Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association average
  • All education average
View the data table
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 893
90 to 1009

Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association by botability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association: 12 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association
  2. All education sites
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association75% (9)25% (3)0% (0)
All education sites71% (1,899)25% (660)5% (128)

Top 3 Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites by botability score

#1 in Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association · U.S. education rank 1

Emporia State University

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

#1 in Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association · U.S. education rank 1

Newman University

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#1 in Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association · U.S. education rank 1

Pittsburg State University

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability D
  • Readability F

Most common botability failures among Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites

Share of the 12 fully scanned Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Sitemap in robots.txt33%
  2. Link text33%
  3. GovernmentOrganization Schema.org type8%
View the data table
CheckShare failingSites failing
Sitemap in robots.txt33%4
Link text33%4
GovernmentOrganization Schema.org type8%1

What each check means

  • Sitemap in robots.txt. The robots.txt file links to the sitemap. Search engines take longer to find your pages.
  • Link text. Links use descriptive text that tells users and search engines where they go. Users cannot tell where links go.
  • GovernmentOrganization Schema.org type. Homepage is marked up as an official government organization. Systems cannot verify you are an official government site.

Every education site with one problem

Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association members by botability score

Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 emporia.edu
Emporia State University U.S. rank 1 		9 of 9 checks pass A
1 newmanu.edu
Newman University U.S. rank 1 		11 of 11 checks pass A
1 pittstate.edu
Pittsburg State University U.S. rank 1 		11 of 11 checks pass A
1 uafs.edu
University of Arkansas-Fort Smith U.S. rank 1 		11 of 11 checks pass A
1 unk.edu
University of Nebraska at Kearney U.S. rank 1 		7 of 7 checks pass A
2 mssu.edu
Missouri Southern State University U.S. rank 2 		10 of 11 checks pass A
2 missouriwestern.edu
Missouri Western State University U.S. rank 2 		10 of 11 checks pass A
2 nwmissouri.edu
Northwest Missouri State University U.S. rank 2 		10 of 11 checks pass A
2 ucmo.edu
University of Central Missouri U.S. rank 2 		10 of 11 checks pass A
3 washburn.edu
Washburn University U.S. rank 3 		8 of 9 checks pass B
4 fhsu.edu
Fort Hays State University U.S. rank 7 		9 of 11 checks pass B
4 nsuok.edu
Northeastern State University U.S. rank 7 		9 of 11 checks pass B
rsu.edu
Rogers State University 		Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 -
uco.edu
University of Central Oklahoma 		Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 9/30/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo