Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association: readability rankings

Readability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 14 Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 14
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

D 67

Average readability score of 12 fully scanned Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites

11th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average readability score

12 of 14

Mid-america intercollegiate athletics association member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades

F 56

Average readability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association readability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 12 fully scanned Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 12 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association readability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 94
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 890
90 to 1008

Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association by readability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association: 12 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics AssociationA (90 to 100): 67% (8 sites)D to F (below 70): 33% (4 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 53% (1,425 sites)D to F (below 70): 41% (1,110 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association by readability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association67% (8)0% (0)33% (4)
All education sites53% (1,425)0% (0)41% (1,110)

Top 3 Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites by readability score

#1 in Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association · U.S. education rank 1

Emporia State University

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

#1 in Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association · U.S. education rank 1

Fort Hays State University

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security B
  • Usability D
  • Readability A

#1 in Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association · U.S. education rank 1

Missouri Southern State University

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

Most common readability failures among Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites

Share of the 12 fully scanned Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Reading level33% (4 of 12 sites)
View the data table
Most common readability failures among Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Reading level33%4

What each check means

  • Reading level. Page text reads at or below a 7th grade level so most users can understand it. Users struggle to understand your content.

Every education site with one problem

Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association members by readability score

Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association members ranked by readability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 emporia.edu
Emporia State University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 fhsu.edu
Fort Hays State University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 mssu.edu
Missouri Southern State University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 missouriwestern.edu
Missouri Western State University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 newmanu.edu
Newman University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 uafs.edu
University of Arkansas-Fort Smith U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 ucmo.edu
University of Central Missouri U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 washburn.edu
Washburn University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
2 nsuok.edu
Northeastern State University U.S. rank 180
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 nwmissouri.edu
Northwest Missouri State University U.S. rank 178
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 pittstate.edu
Pittsburg State University U.S. rank 68
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 unk.edu
University of Nebraska at Kearney U.S. rank 164
0 of 1 checks pass F
rsu.edu
Rogers State University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 -
uco.edu
University of Central Oklahoma
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 9/30/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo