Showing Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites. All education sites
Members of the Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
B 84
Average overall score of 12 fully scanned Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites
8th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score
12 of 14
Mid-america intercollegiate athletics association member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades
B 85
Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association overall scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 12 fully scanned Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 12 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 5 |
| 80 to 89 | 4 |
| 90 to 100 | 3 |
Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association by overall grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association: 12 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association | 25% (3) | 75% (9) | 0% (0) |
| All education sites | 25% (659) | 73% (1,965) | 2% (63) |
Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
Average of the 12 fully scanned Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.
- Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association
- All education
View the data table
| Indicator | Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association average | All education average |
|---|---|---|
| Accessibility | 93 | 91 |
| Botability | 93 | 89 |
| Security | 83 | 85 |
| Usability | 60 | 68 |
| Readability | 67 | 56 |
Top 3 Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites by overall score
#1 in Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association · U.S. education rank 8
University of Arkansas-Fort Smith
A 93 overall
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability B
- Readability A
#2 in Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association · U.S. education rank 9
Newman University
A 92 overall
- Accessibility B
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability A
- Readability A
#3 in Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association · U.S. education rank 11
Missouri Western State University
A 90 overall
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability B
- Readability A
Most common failures by indicator
The check Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.
- 42% (5 of 12 sites) fail this accessibility check: Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing. Buttons and interactive elements are large enough to tap easily on touch screens. More accessibility failures.
- 33% (4 of 12 sites) fail this botability check: Sitemap in robots.txt. The robots.txt file links to the sitemap. More botability failures.
- 67% (8 of 12 sites) fail this security check: X-Content-Type-Options. The site tells browsers not to guess the type of files it serves. More security failures.
- 92% (11 of 12 sites) fail this usability check: Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. More usability failures.
- 33% (4 of 12 sites) fail this readability check: Reading level. Page text reads at or below a 7th grade level so most users can understand it. More readability failures.
Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association members by overall score
| Rank | Site | Indicator grades | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
uafs.edu
University of Arkansas-Fort Smith U.S. rank 8 |
|
A |
| 2 |
newmanu.edu
Newman University U.S. rank 9 |
|
A |
| 3 |
missouriwestern.edu
Missouri Western State University U.S. rank 11 |
|
A |
| 4 |
washburn.edu
Washburn University U.S. rank 12 |
|
B |
| 5 |
fhsu.edu
Fort Hays State University U.S. rank 14 |
|
B |
| 5 |
pittstate.edu
Pittsburg State University U.S. rank 14 |
|
B |
| 6 |
emporia.edu
Emporia State University U.S. rank 19 |
|
B |
| 7 |
mssu.edu
Missouri Southern State University U.S. rank 22 |
|
C |
| 7 |
unk.edu
University of Nebraska at Kearney U.S. rank 22 |
|
C |
| 8 |
nsuok.edu
Northeastern State University U.S. rank 23 |
|
C |
| 8 |
nwmissouri.edu
Northwest Missouri State University U.S. rank 23 |
|
C |
| 9 |
ucmo.edu
University of Central Missouri U.S. rank 26 |
|
C |
|
rsu.edu
Rogers State University |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 | - | |
|
uco.edu
University of Central Oklahoma |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 | - |
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 9/30/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.