Showing Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites. All education sites
Members of the Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
B 83
Average security score of 12 fully scanned Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites
11th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average security score
12 of 14
Mid-america intercollegiate athletics association member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades
B 85
Average security score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association security scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 12 fully scanned Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 12 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 1 |
| 70 to 79 | 4 |
| 80 to 89 | 6 |
| 90 to 100 | 1 |
Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association by security grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association: 12 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association | 8% (1) | 83% (10) | 8% (1) |
| All education sites | 19% (505) | 79% (2,113) | 3% (69) |
Top 3 Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites by security score
#1 in Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association · U.S. education rank 1
Emporia State University
A 100 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability F
- Readability A
#2 in Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association · U.S. education rank 3
Fort Hays State University
B 87 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability B
- Security B
- Usability D
- Readability A
#2 in Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association · U.S. education rank 3
Missouri Southern State University
B 87 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability F
- Readability A
What each check means
- X-Content-Type-Options. The site tells browsers not to guess the type of files it serves. Browsers might run dangerous files by mistake.
- Errors in the console. The page loads without JavaScript or network errors. Site may have hidden bugs that break features.
- Sponsored top-level domain (sTLD). The site uses a government-issued domain (.gov, .edu, or .mil). People cannot tell if your site is real government.
- Security.txt. The site has a security.txt file so researchers know how to report issues. Security researchers cannot report problems to you.
Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association members by security score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
emporia.edu
Emporia State University U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
fhsu.edu
Fort Hays State University U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
mssu.edu
Missouri Southern State University U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
missouriwestern.edu
Missouri Western State University U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
newmanu.edu
Newman University U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
nwmissouri.edu
Northwest Missouri State University U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
uafs.edu
University of Arkansas-Fort Smith U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
unk.edu
University of Nebraska at Kearney U.S. rank 5 |
7 of 9 checks pass | C |
| 4 |
nsuok.edu
Northeastern State University U.S. rank 6 |
6 of 8 checks pass | C |
| 4 |
pittstate.edu
Pittsburg State University U.S. rank 6 |
6 of 8 checks pass | C |
| 4 |
washburn.edu
Washburn University U.S. rank 6 |
6 of 8 checks pass | C |
| 5 |
ucmo.edu
University of Central Missouri U.S. rank 7 |
6 of 9 checks pass | D |
|
rsu.edu
Rogers State University |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 | - | |
|
uco.edu
University of Central Oklahoma |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 | - |
About security
Secure your site and protect users with proper security practices.
Why it's important
Strong defenses prevent hackers from stealing personal information and other confidential data.
Risks
- Hackers can steal private information from your site.
Guidance
What we use to grade security:
- CISA Website Security
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- CISA Cybersecurity Performance Goals
- RFC 9116
- OWASP Top 10
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
Standards
- Content security policy (CSP)
- HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)
- security.txt
- X-Content-Type-Options
- Errors in the console
- Clickjacking mitigation
- Paste preventing inputs
- Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure (HTTPS)
- Sponsored top-level domain (sTLD)
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 9/30/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.