Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association: accessibility rankings

Accessibility scores, grades, and the most common failures for 14 Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 14
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Showing Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites. All education sites

Members of the Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

A 93

Average accessibility score of 12 fully scanned Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites

5th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average accessibility score

12 of 14

Mid-america intercollegiate athletics association member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades

A 91

Average accessibility score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association accessibility scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 12 fully scanned Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

  • Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association average
  • All education average
View the data table
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 892
90 to 10010

Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association by accessibility grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association: 12 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association
  2. All education sites
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association83% (10)17% (2)0% (0)
All education sites66% (1,765)33% (888)1% (34)

Top 3 Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites by accessibility score

#1 in Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association · U.S. education rank 3

Fort Hays State University

A 96 accessibility

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security B
  • Usability D
  • Readability A

#1 in Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association · U.S. education rank 3

Missouri Western State University

A 96 accessibility

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#1 in Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association · U.S. education rank 3

Pittsburg State University

A 96 accessibility

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability D
  • Readability F

Most common accessibility failures among Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites

Share of the 12 fully scanned Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to its standard and how to fix it.

  1. Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing42%
  2. Image aspect ratio42%
  3. Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order25%
  4. Document has a main landmark17%
  5. Elements with visible text labels have matching accessible names17%
View the data table
CheckShare failingSites failing
Touch targets have sufficient size and spacing42%5
Image aspect ratio42%5
Heading elements appear in a sequentially-descending order25%3
Document has a main landmark17%2
Elements with visible text labels have matching accessible names17%2

What each check means

Mid-America Intercollegiate Athletics Association members by accessibility score

Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 fhsu.edu
Fort Hays State University U.S. rank 3 		30 of 31 checks pass A
1 missouriwestern.edu
Missouri Western State University U.S. rank 3 		27 of 28 checks pass A
1 pittstate.edu
Pittsburg State University U.S. rank 3 		32 of 33 checks pass A
1 washburn.edu
Washburn University U.S. rank 3 		29 of 30 checks pass A
2 emporia.edu
Emporia State University U.S. rank 5 		32 of 34 checks pass A
2 uafs.edu
University of Arkansas-Fort Smith U.S. rank 5 		34 of 36 checks pass A
2 unk.edu
University of Nebraska at Kearney U.S. rank 5 		32 of 34 checks pass A
3 mssu.edu
Missouri Southern State University U.S. rank 6 		29 of 31 checks pass A
4 nsuok.edu
Northeastern State University U.S. rank 7 		25 of 27 checks pass A
5 nwmissouri.edu
Northwest Missouri State University U.S. rank 9 		28 of 31 checks pass A
6 ucmo.edu
University of Central Missouri U.S. rank 10 		25 of 28 checks pass B
7 newmanu.edu
Newman University U.S. rank 11 		23 of 26 checks pass B
rsu.edu
Rogers State University 		Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 -
uco.edu
University of Central Oklahoma 		Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 9/30/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo