Mid-American Conference: security rankings

Security scores, grades, and the most common failures for 12 Mid-American Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 12
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Mid-American Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 86

Average security score of 8 fully scanned Mid-American Conference member sites

8th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average security score

8 of 12

Mid-american conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 4, so they're listed without grades

B 85

Average security score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Mid-American Conference security scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned Mid-American Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 8 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Mid-American Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Mid-American Conference security scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 691
70 to 791
80 to 894
90 to 1002

Mid-American Conference by security grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Mid-American Conference: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Mid-American ConferenceA (90 to 100): 25% (2 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 63% (5 sites)D to F (below 70): 13% (1 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 19% (505 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 79% (2,113 sites)D to F (below 70): 3% (69 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Mid-American Conference by security grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Mid-American Conference25% (2)63% (5)13% (1)
All education sites19% (505)79% (2,113)3% (69)

Top 3 Mid-American Conference member sites by security score

#1 in Mid-American Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Central Michigan University

A 100 security

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability D
  • Readability A

#1 in Mid-American Conference · U.S. education rank 1

University of Massachusetts-Amherst

A 100 security

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability D
  • Readability F

#2 in Mid-American Conference · U.S. education rank 3

Bowling Green State University-Main Campus

B 87 security

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

Most common security failures among Mid-American Conference member sites

Share of the 8 fully scanned Mid-American Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to its standard and how to fix it.

  1. X-Content-Type-Options50% (4 of 8 sites)
  2. Errors in the console50% (4 of 8 sites)
  3. Sponsored top-level domain (sTLD)13% (1 of 8 sites)
View the data table
Most common security failures among Mid-American Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
X-Content-Type-Options50%4
Errors in the console50%4
Sponsored top-level domain (sTLD)13%1

What each check means

  • X-Content-Type-Options. The site tells browsers not to guess the type of files it serves. Browsers might run dangerous files by mistake.
  • Errors in the console. The page loads without JavaScript or network errors. Site may have hidden bugs that break features.
  • Sponsored top-level domain (sTLD). The site uses a government-issued domain (.gov, .edu, or .mil). People cannot tell if your site is real government.

Mid-American Conference members by security score

Mid-American Conference members ranked by security score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 cmich.edu
Central Michigan University U.S. rank 1
8 of 8 checks pass A
1 umass.edu
University of Massachusetts-Amherst U.S. rank 1
8 of 8 checks pass A
2 bgsu.edu
Bowling Green State University-Main Campus U.S. rank 3
7 of 8 checks pass B
2 buffalo.edu
University at Buffalo U.S. rank 3
7 of 8 checks pass B
2 uakron.edu
University of Akron Main Campus U.S. rank 3
7 of 8 checks pass B
2 wmich.edu
Western Michigan University U.S. rank 3
7 of 8 checks pass B
3 miamioh.edu
Miami University-Oxford U.S. rank 6
6 of 8 checks pass C
4 ohio.edu
Ohio University-Main Campus U.S. rank 8
5 of 8 checks pass D
bsu.edu
Ball State University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 -
emich.edu
Eastern Michigan University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
kent.edu
Kent State University at Kent
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -
utoledo.edu
University of Toledo
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 4 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo