Mid-American Conference: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 12 Mid-American Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 12
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Showing Mid-American Conference member sites. All education sites

Members of the Mid-American Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

D 67

Average usability score of 8 fully scanned Mid-American Conference member sites

15th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

8 of 12

Mid-american conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 4, so they're listed without grades

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Mid-American Conference usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned Mid-American Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

  • Mid-American Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 592
60 to 693
70 to 792
80 to 890
90 to 1001

Mid-American Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Mid-American Conference: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Mid-American Conference
  2. All education sites
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Mid-American Conference13% (1)25% (2)63% (5)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 Mid-American Conference member sites by usability score

#1 in Mid-American Conference · U.S. education rank 2

Miami University-Oxford

A 93 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#2 in Mid-American Conference · U.S. education rank 14

Bowling Green State University-Main Campus

C 73 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

#2 in Mid-American Conference · U.S. education rank 14

University of Akron Main Campus

C 73 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

Most common usability failures among Mid-American Conference member sites

Share of the 8 fully scanned Mid-American Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. First Contentful Paint (FCP)63%
  2. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)63%
  3. Open Graph image alt63%
  4. Open Graph site name50%
  5. Open Graph type50%
View the data table
CheckShare failingSites failing
First Contentful Paint (FCP)63%5
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)63%5
Open Graph image alt63%5
Open Graph site name50%4
Open Graph type50%4

What each check means

  • First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
  • Open Graph type. The page declares its content type for social media cards. Social media shows wrong content type.

Every education site with one problem

Mid-American Conference members by usability score

Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 miamioh.edu
Miami University-Oxford U.S. rank 2 		15 of 16 checks pass A
2 bgsu.edu
Bowling Green State University-Main Campus U.S. rank 14 		11 of 15 checks pass C
2 uakron.edu
University of Akron Main Campus U.S. rank 14 		11 of 15 checks pass C
3 wmich.edu
Western Michigan University U.S. rank 17 		11 of 16 checks pass D
4 cmich.edu
Central Michigan University U.S. rank 21 		9 of 15 checks pass D
4 umass.edu
University of Massachusetts-Amherst U.S. rank 21 		9 of 15 checks pass D
5 ohio.edu
Ohio University-Main Campus U.S. rank 23 		9 of 16 checks pass F
6 buffalo.edu
University at Buffalo U.S. rank 24 		8 of 15 checks pass F
bsu.edu
Ball State University 		Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 -
emich.edu
Eastern Michigan University 		Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
kent.edu
Kent State University at Kent 		Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -
utoledo.edu
University of Toledo 		Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 4 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo