Showing Mid-Eastern Athletic Conf. member sites. All education sites
Members of the Mid-Eastern Athletic Conf. (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
F 49
Average usability score of 7 fully scanned Mid-Eastern Athletic Conf. member sites
26th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score
7 of 8
Mid-eastern athletic conf. member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades
D 68
Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Mid-Eastern Athletic Conf. usability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 7 fully scanned Mid-Eastern Athletic Conf. member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 7 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Mid-Eastern Athletic Conf. average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 1 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 3 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 3 |
| 70 to 79 | 0 |
| 80 to 89 | 0 |
| 90 to 100 | 0 |
Mid-Eastern Athletic Conf. by usability grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Mid-Eastern Athletic Conf.: 7 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid-Eastern Athletic Conf. | 0% (0) | 0% (0) | 100% (7) |
| All education sites | 11% (289) | 42% (1,124) | 47% (1,274) |
Top 3 Mid-Eastern Athletic Conf. member sites by usability score
#1 in Mid-Eastern Athletic Conf. · U.S. education rank 17
Howard University
D 68 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability B
- Security A
- Usability D
- Readability F
#2 in Mid-Eastern Athletic Conf. · U.S. education rank 18
Delaware State University
D 66 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability B
- Security A
- Usability D
- Readability F
#3 in Mid-Eastern Athletic Conf. · U.S. education rank 21
Morgan State University
D 60 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability D
- Readability F
What each check means
- Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
- Open Graph URL. The page has a canonical URL for social media sharing. Shared links may point to wrong page.
- First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
- Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
Every education site with one problem
- Education websites missing Open Graph tags: 1,859 of 2,687 fully scanned education sites (69%), with every site listed.
Mid-Eastern Athletic Conf. members by usability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
howard.edu
Howard University U.S. rank 17 |
11 of 16 checks pass | D |
| 2 |
desu.edu
Delaware State University U.S. rank 18 |
10 of 15 checks pass | D |
| 3 |
morgan.edu
Morgan State University U.S. rank 21 |
9 of 15 checks pass | D |
| 4 |
scsu.edu
South Carolina State University U.S. rank 27 |
7 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 5 |
coppin.edu
Coppin State University U.S. rank 29 |
6 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 5 |
nccu.edu
North Carolina Central University U.S. rank 29 |
6 of 15 checks pass | F |
| 6 |
nsu.edu
Norfolk State University U.S. rank 35 |
4 of 14 checks pass | F |
|
umes.edu
University of Maryland Eastern Shore |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 | - |
About usability
Optimize content structure so users quickly find what they need.
Why it's important
Well-written pages help people understand laws, services, and procedures without confusion, reducing calls and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your information.
Guidance
What we use to grade usability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Google Search Central
- Web Vitals / Core Web Vitals
- Open Graph
Standards
- Page title
- Page description
- Viewport meta tag
- www resolution
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
- First Contentful Paint (FCP)
- Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- Time to First Byte (TTFB)
- Open Graph site name
- Open Graph type
- Open Graph title
- Open Graph description
- Open Graph URL
- Open Graph image
- Open Graph image alt
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.