Middle Atlantic Conference Commonwealth: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 9 Middle Atlantic Conference Commonwealth member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 9
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Middle Atlantic Conference Commonwealth (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

C 70

Average usability score of 9 fully scanned Middle Atlantic Conference Commonwealth member sites

12th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

9 of 9

Middle atlantic conference commonwealth member sites fully scanned

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Middle Atlantic Conference Commonwealth usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 9 fully scanned Middle Atlantic Conference Commonwealth member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 9 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Middle Atlantic Conference Commonwealth average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Middle Atlantic Conference Commonwealth usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 592
60 to 693
70 to 791
80 to 892
90 to 1001

Middle Atlantic Conference Commonwealth by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Middle Atlantic Conference Commonwealth: 9 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Middle Atlantic Conference CommonwealthA (90 to 100): 11% (1 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 33% (3 sites)D to F (below 70): 56% (5 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 11% (289 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 42% (1,124 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (1,274 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Middle Atlantic Conference Commonwealth by usability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Middle Atlantic Conference Commonwealth11% (1)33% (3)56% (5)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 Middle Atlantic Conference Commonwealth member sites by usability score

#1 in Middle Atlantic Conference Commonwealth · U.S. education rank 2

Messiah University

A 93 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#2 in Middle Atlantic Conference Commonwealth · U.S. education rank 9

Albright College

B 81 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability D
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#2 in Middle Atlantic Conference Commonwealth · U.S. education rank 9

Neumann University

B 81 usability

  • Accessibility D
  • Botability B
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

Most common usability failures among Middle Atlantic Conference Commonwealth member sites

Share of the 9 fully scanned Middle Atlantic Conference Commonwealth member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt78% (7 of 9 sites)
  2. Open Graph site name67% (6 of 9 sites)
  3. Open Graph image56% (5 of 9 sites)
  4. Interaction to Next Paint (INP)44% (4 of 9 sites)
  5. Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)44% (4 of 9 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among Middle Atlantic Conference Commonwealth member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt78%7
Open Graph site name67%6
Open Graph image56%5
Interaction to Next Paint (INP)44%4
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)44%4

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
  • Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
  • Interaction to Next Paint (INP). The page responds to user interactions in under 0.2 seconds. Site feels frozen when users click things.
  • Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS). Page content stays in place as the page loads. Users click wrong buttons by mistake.

Every education site with one problem

Middle Atlantic Conference Commonwealth members by usability score

Middle Atlantic Conference Commonwealth members ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 messiah.edu
Messiah University U.S. rank 2
15 of 16 checks pass A
2 albright.edu
Albright College U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
2 neumann.edu
Neumann University U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
3 hood.edu
Hood College U.S. rank 14
11 of 15 checks pass C
4 ycp.edu
York College of Pennsylvania U.S. rank 17
11 of 16 checks pass D
5 alvernia.edu
Alvernia University U.S. rank 20
10 of 16 checks pass D
5 stevenson.edu
Stevenson University U.S. rank 20
10 of 16 checks pass D
6 widener.edu
Widener University U.S. rank 23
9 of 16 checks pass F
7 eastern.edu
Eastern University U.S. rank 25
8 of 16 checks pass F

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo