Showing Mid-American Conference member sites. All education sites
Members of the Mid-American Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
A 91
Average botability score of 8 fully scanned Mid-American Conference member sites
7th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average botability score
8 of 12
Mid-american conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 4, so they're listed without grades
B 89
Average botability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Mid-American Conference botability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned Mid-American Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 8 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Mid-American Conference average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 2 |
| 80 to 89 | 0 |
| 90 to 100 | 6 |
Mid-American Conference by botability grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Mid-American Conference: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid-American Conference | 75% (6) | 25% (2) | 0% (0) |
| All education sites | 71% (1,899) | 25% (660) | 5% (128) |
Top 3 Mid-American Conference member sites by botability score
#1 in Mid-American Conference · U.S. education rank 1
Bowling Green State University-Main Campus
A 100 botability
- Accessibility B
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability C
- Readability A
#1 in Mid-American Conference · U.S. education rank 1
Central Michigan University
A 100 botability
- Accessibility B
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability D
- Readability A
#1 in Mid-American Conference · U.S. education rank 1
Miami University-Oxford
A 100 botability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability A
- Readability F
What each check means
- Sitemap in robots.txt. The robots.txt file links to the sitemap. Search engines take longer to find your pages.
- Sitemap status. The sitemap file loads and returns a successful response. Search engines cannot find all your pages.
- Sitemap XML. The sitemap file uses the required XML format. Search engines cannot read your sitemap.
- Content available in document. The page's main content loads without requiring JavaScript. Bots cannot read your content.
- GovernmentOrganization Schema.org type. Homepage is marked up as an official government organization. Systems cannot verify you are an official government site.
Every education site with one problem
- Education websites with sitemap problems: 1,031 of 2,650 fully scanned education sites (39%), with every site listed.
- Education websites with robots.txt problems: 95 of 2,629 fully scanned education sites (4%), with every site listed.
- Education websites that need JavaScript to show their content: 68 of 2,687 fully scanned education sites (3%), with every site listed.
Mid-American Conference members by botability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
bgsu.edu
Bowling Green State University-Main Campus U.S. rank 1 |
9 of 9 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
cmich.edu
Central Michigan University U.S. rank 1 |
11 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
miamioh.edu
Miami University-Oxford U.S. rank 1 |
11 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
uakron.edu
University of Akron Main Campus U.S. rank 1 |
11 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
umass.edu
University of Massachusetts-Amherst U.S. rank 2 |
10 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
wmich.edu
Western Michigan University U.S. rank 2 |
10 of 11 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
ohio.edu
Ohio University-Main Campus U.S. rank 11 |
8 of 11 checks pass | C |
| 3 |
buffalo.edu
University at Buffalo U.S. rank 11 |
8 of 11 checks pass | C |
|
bsu.edu
Ball State University |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 | - | |
|
emich.edu
Eastern Michigan University |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 | - | |
|
kent.edu
Kent State University at Kent |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
utoledo.edu
University of Toledo |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - |
About botability
Help AI and search engines discover, crawl, and index your website.
Why it's important
Smart technology can better process and share public information, making services faster and more efficient for users.
Risks
- AI tools cannot find or understand your content.
Guidance
What we use to grade botability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- The Web Robots Pages
- Schema.org
- sitemaps.org
- Google Search Central
Standards
- Crawlable
- Content available in document
- GovernmentOrganization Schema.org type
- Sitemap status
- Sitemap XML
- Robots valid
- Robots allowed
- Sitemap in robots.txt
- Canonical
- Link text
- hreflang
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 4 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.