Mid-American Conference: botability rankings

Botability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 12 Mid-American Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 12
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Mid-American Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

A 91

Average botability score of 8 fully scanned Mid-American Conference member sites

7th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average botability score

8 of 12

Mid-american conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 4, so they're listed without grades

B 89

Average botability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Mid-American Conference botability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned Mid-American Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 8 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Mid-American Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Mid-American Conference botability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 792
80 to 890
90 to 1006

Mid-American Conference by botability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Mid-American Conference: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Mid-American ConferenceA (90 to 100): 75% (6 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 25% (2 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 71% (1,899 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 25% (660 sites)D to F (below 70): 5% (128 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Mid-American Conference by botability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Mid-American Conference75% (6)25% (2)0% (0)
All education sites71% (1,899)25% (660)5% (128)

Top 3 Mid-American Conference member sites by botability score

#1 in Mid-American Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Bowling Green State University-Main Campus

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

#1 in Mid-American Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Central Michigan University

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability D
  • Readability A

#1 in Mid-American Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Miami University-Oxford

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

Most common botability failures among Mid-American Conference member sites

Share of the 8 fully scanned Mid-American Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Sitemap in robots.txt38% (3 of 8 sites)
  2. Sitemap status13% (1 of 8 sites)
  3. Sitemap XML13% (1 of 8 sites)
  4. Content available in document13% (1 of 8 sites)
  5. GovernmentOrganization Schema.org type13% (1 of 8 sites)
View the data table
Most common botability failures among Mid-American Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Sitemap in robots.txt38%3
Sitemap status13%1
Sitemap XML13%1
Content available in document13%1
GovernmentOrganization Schema.org type13%1

What each check means

  • Sitemap in robots.txt. The robots.txt file links to the sitemap. Search engines take longer to find your pages.
  • Sitemap status. The sitemap file loads and returns a successful response. Search engines cannot find all your pages.
  • Sitemap XML. The sitemap file uses the required XML format. Search engines cannot read your sitemap.
  • Content available in document. The page's main content loads without requiring JavaScript. Bots cannot read your content.
  • GovernmentOrganization Schema.org type. Homepage is marked up as an official government organization. Systems cannot verify you are an official government site.

Every education site with one problem

Mid-American Conference members by botability score

Mid-American Conference members ranked by botability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 bgsu.edu
Bowling Green State University-Main Campus U.S. rank 1
9 of 9 checks pass A
1 cmich.edu
Central Michigan University U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 miamioh.edu
Miami University-Oxford U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 uakron.edu
University of Akron Main Campus U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
2 umass.edu
University of Massachusetts-Amherst U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 wmich.edu
Western Michigan University U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
3 ohio.edu
Ohio University-Main Campus U.S. rank 11
8 of 11 checks pass C
3 buffalo.edu
University at Buffalo U.S. rank 11
8 of 11 checks pass C
bsu.edu
Ball State University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 -
emich.edu
Eastern Michigan University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
kent.edu
Kent State University at Kent
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -
utoledo.edu
University of Toledo
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 4 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo