State websites ranked by digital experience

Project ScanGov rankings of every U.S. state government website by overall digital experience grade, with accessibility, botability, security, and usability scores and the most common failures.

  • Sites: 51
  • Last scan: 9/27/2026

B 85

Average overall score of 44 fully scanned state sites

44 of 51

State sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 7, so they're listed without grades

27%

Fully scanned state sites earning an A for overall (12 sites)

5%

Fully scanned state sites earning a D or F for overall (2 sites)

How U.S. state overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 44 fully scanned U.S. state sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 44 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Average
View the data table
How U.S. state overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 692
70 to 798
80 to 8922
90 to 10012

Overall grade by state

Each state is colored by its main site's overall grade. Select a state for its report.

hbex.coveredca.com / Grade: C / Score: 78% dnrec.delaware.gov / Grade: B / Score: 87% in.gov / Grade: B / Score: 87% mass.gov / Grade: A / Score: 95% myflorida.gov / Grade: A / Score: 93% wyo.gov / Grade: B / Score: 85% oklahoma.gov / Grade: B / Score: 85% idaho.gov / Grade: B / Score: 87% ct.gov / Grade: A / Score: 91% colorado.gov / Not fully scanned (995) alabama.gov / Grade: B / Score: 82% vermont.gov / Grade: B / Score: 83% louisiana.gov / Grade: B / Score: 81% tn.gov / Grade: B / Score: 82% pa.gov / Grade: B / Score: 88% virginia.gov / Grade: B / Score: 88% mo.gov / Grade: C / Score: 78% wv.gov / Grade: B / Score: 81% mt.gov / Grade: B / Score: 81% illinois.gov / Grade: B / Score: 88% mississippi.gov / Grade: C / Score: 78% maine.gov / Grade: C / Score: 77% alaska.gov / Grade: D / Score: 64% portal.ehawaii.gov / Grade: A / Score: 98% mn.gov / Grade: D / Score: 62% arkansas.gov / Grade: B / Score: 87% wisconsin.gov / Grade: A / Score: 95% nebraska.gov / Grade: A / Score: 93% maryland.gov / Grade: A / Score: 95% nh.gov / Not fully scanned (995) georgia.gov / Grade: B / Score: 89% ri.gov / Grade: C / Score: 74% sc.gov / Grade: C / Score: 75% iowa.gov / Grade: A / Score: 97% kentucky.gov / Grade: C / Score: 79% oregon.gov / Grade: B / Score: 80% sd.gov / Grade: C / Score: 75% nc.gov / Grade: A / Score: 96% texas.gov / Grade: A / Score: 92% nm.gov / Grade: B / Score: 89% kansas.gov / Grade: B / Score: 87% dc.gov / Grade: C / Score: 75% ny.gov / Grade: A / Score: 95% utah.gov / Grade: B / Score: 89% nj.gov / Grade: B / Score: 83% nd.gov / Grade: B / Score: 87% az.gov / Not fully scanned (996) nv.gov / Not fully scanned (998) wa.gov / Not fully scanned (998) ohio.gov / Not fully scanned (404) michigan.gov / Not fully scanned (403)

Legend:   A   B-C   D-F   Not fully scanned / no data

U.S. state sites by overall grade

Share of the 44 fully scanned U.S. state sites in each grade band

  1. All U.S. state sitesA (90 to 100): 27% (12 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 68% (30 sites)D to F (below 70): 5% (2 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
U.S. state sites by overall grade
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
All U.S. state sites27% (12)68% (30)5% (2)

Most common failures by indicator

The check state sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

All state sites by overall score

Site rankings
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 ca.gov
State of California
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
A
1 hawaii.gov
State of Hawaii
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
A
2 iowa.gov
State of Iowa
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
A
3 nc.gov
State of North Carolina
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
A
4 mass.gov
State of Massachusetts
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
A
4 wisconsin.gov
State of Wisconsin
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
A
4 maryland.gov
State of Maryland
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
A
4 ny.gov
State of New York
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
A
5 myflorida.gov
State of Florida
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
A
5 nebraska.gov
State of Nebraska
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
A
6 texas.gov
State of Texas
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
A
7 ct.gov
State of Connecticut
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
A
8 georgia.gov
State of Georgia
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
B
8 nm.gov
State of New Mexico
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
B
8 utah.gov
State of Utah
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
B
9 pa.gov
State of Pennsylvania
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
B
9 virginia.gov
State of Virginia
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade F
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
B
9 illinois.gov
State of Illinois
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
B
10 in.gov
State of Indiana
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
B
10 idaho.gov
State of Idaho
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
B
10 arkansas.gov
State of Arkansas
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
B
10 kansas.gov
State of Kansas
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
B
10 nd.gov
State of North Dakota
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
B
11 wyo.gov
State of Wyoming
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
B
11 oklahoma.gov
State of Oklahoma
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
B
11 de.gov
State of Delaware
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
B
12 vermont.gov
State of Vermont
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
B
12 nj.gov
State of New Jersey
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
B
13 alabama.gov
State of Alabama
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
B
13 tn.gov
State of Tennessee
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade F
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
B
14 louisiana.gov
State of Louisiana
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
B
14 wv.gov
State of West Virginia
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
B
14 mt.gov
State of Montana
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
B
15 oregon.gov
State of Oregon
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
B
16 kentucky.gov
State of Kentucky
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
C
17 mo.gov
State of Missouri
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
C
17 mississippi.gov
State of Mississippi
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
C
18 maine.gov
State of Maine
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
C
19 sc.gov
State of South Carolina
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
C
19 sd.gov
State of South Dakota
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
C
19 dc.gov
District of Columbia
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
C
20 ri.gov
State of Rhode Island
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
C
21 alaska.gov
State of Alaska
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade F
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
D
22 mn.gov
State of Minnesota
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
D
colorado.gov
State of Colorado
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -
nh.gov
State of New Hampshire
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -
az.gov
State of Arizona
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
nv.gov
State of Nevada
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 -
wa.gov
State of Washington
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 -
ohio.gov
State of Ohio
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 404 -
michigan.gov
State of Michigan
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of the main website of each U.S. state government and the District of Columbia. Scores come from the checks listed on standards.scangov.org. Sites were scanned between 7/27/2026 and 9/26/2026; each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage returned successfully and sent the scanner its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We weren't able to fully scan 7 sites because they did not respond, blocked the scanner, or returned no page content. They appear in the table without grades, each with its scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale, and rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, including every county's raw results, is published in the ScanGov data repository.