County websites ranked by digital experience

Project ScanGov rankings of U.S. county government websites by overall digital experience grade, with accessibility, botability, security, usability, and readability scores and a page for every state.

  • Sites: 2842
  • Last scan: 10/9/2026

C 76

Average overall score of 2,421 fully scanned U.S. county sites

2,421 of 2,842

County sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 421, so they're listed without grades

48

States with county sites on our list, each with its own page

4%

Fully scanned county sites earning an A for overall (88 sites)

How U.S. county overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 2,421 fully scanned U.S. county sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 2421 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Average
View the data table
How U.S. county overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 491
50 to 5928
60 to 69289
70 to 791,381
80 to 89634
90 to 10088

County sites by state

Average overall score of the fully scanned county sites in each state, darker for higher. Select a state on the map or in the table for its county rankings.

Alabama: no county sites on our list / No data Alaska: 15 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 76 Arizona: 10 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 78 Arkansas: 41 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 76 California: 39 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 77 Colorado: 33 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 77 Connecticut: 9 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 78 Delaware: 3 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 79 Florida: 51 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 79 Georgia: 132 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 75 Hawaii: 1 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 89 Idaho: 37 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 75 Illinois: 86 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 78 Indiana: 49 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 77 Iowa: 77 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 76 Kansas: 85 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 75 Kentucky: 95 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 73 Louisiana: 41 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 76 Maine: 13 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 78 Maryland: 19 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 76 Massachusetts: 7 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 75 Michigan: 68 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 75 Minnesota: 73 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 77 Mississippi: 68 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 76 Missouri: 87 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 78 Montana: 49 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 79 Nebraska: 92 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 80 Nevada: 14 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 75 New Hampshire: 10 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 75 New Jersey: 13 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 76 New Mexico: 26 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 74 New York: 52 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 77 North Carolina: 85 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 75 North Dakota: 44 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 79 Ohio: 80 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 76 Oklahoma: 51 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 74 Oregon: 29 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 77 Pennsylvania: 55 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 77 Rhode Island: no county sites on our list / No data South Carolina: 41 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 77 South Dakota: 51 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 78 Tennessee: 84 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 77 Texas: 237 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 75 Utah: 28 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 79 Vermont: 1 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 82 Virginia: 81 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 76 Washington: 35 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 76 West Virginia: 50 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 77 Wisconsin: 52 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 77 Wyoming: 22 fully scanned county sites / Average score: 74 District of Columbia: no county sites on our list / No data

Legend: 7389 Average score, lighter is lower   No data

U.S. county sites by overall grade

Share of the 2,421 fully scanned U.S. county sites in each grade band

  1. All U.S. county sitesA (90 to 100): 4% (88 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 83% (2,015 sites)D to F (below 70): 13% (318 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
U.S. county sites by overall grade
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
All U.S. county sites4% (88)83% (2,015)13% (318)
States by average county site grade in each indicator
State Sites Overall AccessibilityBotabilitySecurityUsabilityReadability
Alaska 15 of 19 C 76 B 86 C 76 B 85 F 50 D 60
Arizona 10 of 14 C 78 B 89 B 81 A 91 F 45 F 56
Arkansas 41 of 55 C 76 B 86 C 78 B 87 F 50 C 70
California 39 of 57 C 77 A 90 C 78 B 88 F 42 D 65
Colorado 33 of 63 C 77 B 89 C 78 B 87 F 45 C 70
Connecticut 9 of 9 C 78 B 88 C 79 B 86 F 58 F 0
Delaware 3 of 3 C 79 A 93 C 78 A 96 F 41 D 67
Florida 51 of 65 C 79 A 90 C 77 B 87 F 52 F 48
Georgia 132 of 155 C 75 B 87 C 78 B 86 F 44 D 60
Hawaii 1 of 2 B 89 A 97 A 90 B 87 D 68 A 100
Idaho 37 of 43 C 75 B 87 C 78 B 86 F 42 D 62
Illinois 86 of 96 C 78 B 87 C 78 A 90 F 53 D 66
Indiana 49 of 76 C 77 B 86 C 78 A 90 F 49 D 65
Iowa 77 of 99 C 76 B 81 C 72 A 94 F 58 C 79
Kansas 85 of 101 C 75 B 88 C 77 B 85 F 44 C 79
Kentucky 95 of 115 C 73 B 87 C 74 B 86 F 41 F 46
Louisiana 41 of 50 C 76 B 86 C 76 B 84 F 53 C 76
Maine 13 of 16 C 78 A 91 C 76 B 88 F 46 F 50
Maryland 19 of 24 C 76 B 89 C 78 A 90 F 41 F 33
Massachusetts 7 of 8 C 75 B 86 C 75 B 87 F 43 C 71
Michigan 68 of 81 C 75 B 87 C 75 B 85 F 46 D 62
Minnesota 73 of 87 C 77 B 89 C 75 A 92 F 44 D 66
Mississippi 68 of 74 C 76 B 87 C 76 B 84 F 53 F 48
Missouri 87 of 97 C 78 B 88 B 80 B 85 F 55 D 61
Montana 49 of 54 C 79 B 88 B 81 A 90 F 53 C 74
Nebraska 92 of 93 B 80 A 95 B 82 A 98 F 39 B 82
Nevada 14 of 17 C 75 B 86 C 74 B 88 F 42 D 64
New Hampshire 10 of 10 C 75 B 88 C 78 B 85 F 43 F 40
New Jersey 13 of 20 C 76 B 87 C 78 B 86 F 48 D 62
New Mexico 26 of 33 C 74 B 87 C 77 B 84 F 41 C 76
New York 52 of 55 C 77 A 90 C 75 A 95 F 44 D 60
North Carolina 85 of 100 C 75 B 86 C 77 B 89 F 43 F 52
North Dakota 44 of 51 C 79 A 91 C 74 B 85 F 57 D 68
Ohio 80 of 88 C 76 B 89 C 76 B 87 F 48 D 67
Oklahoma 51 of 55 C 74 B 89 D 69 B 87 F 41 F 43
Oregon 29 of 35 C 77 A 90 C 77 A 90 F 46 F 36
Pennsylvania 55 of 60 C 77 A 90 C 76 B 88 F 46 F 53
South Carolina 41 of 46 C 77 B 87 C 72 A 90 F 50 D 63
South Dakota 51 of 54 C 78 B 87 B 81 B 85 F 57 F 52
Tennessee 84 of 94 C 77 B 86 C 76 B 89 F 53 F 56
Texas 237 of 255 C 75 A 91 D 69 B 84 F 38 F 56
Utah 28 of 30 C 79 A 91 B 80 A 96 F 46 C 75
Vermont 1 of 1 B 82 B 81 B 81 A 100 C 75 A 100
Virginia 81 of 96 C 76 B 87 C 78 A 90 F 40 D 61
Washington 35 of 39 C 76 B 89 C 76 A 91 F 40 F 58
West Virginia 50 of 52 C 77 B 85 C 75 B 87 F 57 F 57
Wisconsin 52 of 72 C 77 B 89 C 77 B 89 F 47 D 68
Wyoming 22 of 23 C 74 B 84 C 76 A 90 F 40 D 64

No county sites on our list yet for Alabama, Rhode Island. Connecticut and Rhode Island have no county governments; Connecticut's planning regions stand in for its counties.

All U.S. county sites by overall score

Site rankings
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 randolphcounty-mo.com
Randolph County, MO
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
2 scottky.gov
Scott County, KY
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
3 cookcountyil.gov
Cook County, IL
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade -
A
3 carrollcountyohio.us
Carroll County, OH
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade -
A
3 pikecountyohcommissioners.gov
Pike County, OH
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade -
A
4 jocogov.org
Johnson County, Kansas
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
4 putnamcountywv.gov
Putnam County, WV
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
4 browncountyne.gov
Brown County, NE
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
4 weld.gov
Weld County, CO
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
4 louisacountyia.gov
Louisa County, IA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
4 walkercountyga.gov
Walker County, GA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
5 tatecountyms.gov
Tate County, MS
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
5 boonemo.gov
Boone County, MO
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
5 nowataok.gov
Nowata County, OK
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
5 ripleycounty.in.gov
Ripley County, IN
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
5 marioncounty.arkansas.gov
Marion County, AR
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
5 greenecounty.arkansas.gov
Greene County, AR
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
5 mydarkecounty.com
Darke County, OH
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
5 braxtoncountywv.gov
Braxton County, WV
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
5 yavapaiaz.gov
Yavapai County, AZ
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
5 fentresscountytn.gov
Fentress County, TN
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
5 juabcounty.gov
Juab County, UT
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
6 franklincountyohio.gov
Franklin County, OH
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
6 wetzelcountywv.gov
Wetzel County, WV
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade -
A
6 co.maverick.tx.us
Maverick County, TX
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
6 hamiltoncountyil.gov
Hamilton County, IL
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
A
6 greenwoodcounty-sc.gov
Greenwood County, SC
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
6 kanawha.us
Kanawha County, WV
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
6 co.forest.wi.gov
Forest County, WI
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
6 pleasantscountywv.gov
Pleasants County, WV
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
6 wheatlandcomt.gov
Wheatland County, MT
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
6 parkcounty-wy.gov
Park County, WY
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
7 pwcva.gov
Prince William County, VA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
7 stlouis-mo.gov
City of St. Louis, MO
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
7 beltramicountymn.gov
Beltrami County, MN
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
7 ponderacountymt.gov
Pondera County, MT
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade -
A
7 clarendoncountysc.gov
Clarendon County, SC
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
7 morgancountyutah.gov
Morgan County, UT
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
7 bambergcounty.sc.gov
Bamberg County, SC
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
7 redwoodcounty-mn.gov
Redwood County, MN
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
7 galliacountyoh.gov
Gallia County, OH
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
7 adamscountyco.gov
Adams County, CO
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
7 onondaga.gov
Onondaga County, NY
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
7 jeffersoncounty-mt.gov
Jefferson County, MT
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
7 madisoncountyne.gov
Madison County, NE
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
7 lawrencecountymo.org
Lawrence County, MO
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
7 masoncountyil.gov
Mason County, IL
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
7 treasurecountymt.gov
Treasure County, MT
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade -
A
7 madisoncounty.in.gov
Madison County, IN
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
7 texascountymissouri.gov
Texas County, MO
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
7 tunicacountymississippi.com
Tunica County, MS
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade -
A
7 tarrantcountytx.gov
Tarrant County, TX
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
7 co.summitoh.net
Summit County, OH
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
7 unioncountyor.gov
Union County, OR
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
7 arlingtonva.us
Arlington County, VA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
7 jeffersoncountytx.gov
Jefferson County, TX
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
7 flaglercounty.gov
Flagler County, FL
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade -
A
7 stutsmancounty.gov
Stutsman County, ND
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
7 burleigh.gov
Burleigh County, ND
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
7 henrico.gov
Henrico County, VA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
A
7 ucnj.org
Union County, NJ
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
7 denvergov.org
City and County of Denver, CO
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
8 nesscountyks.gov
Ness County, KS
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
A
8 delawarecounty.in.gov
Delaware County, IN
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
8 wycokck.org
Wyandotte County, KS
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
A
8 charlesmixcounty.gov
Charles Mix County, SD
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
8 fayettecountyillinois.gov
Fayette County, IL
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
8 leecova.com
Lee County, VA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
8 clayconc.com
Clay County, NC
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
8 randolphctywv.gov
Randolph County, WV
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade -
A
8 fultoncountyil.gov
Fulton County, IL
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
8 oceana.mi.us
Oceana County, MI
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
8 johnstonnc.gov
Johnston County, NC
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
8 woodcountywv.com
Wood County, WV
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
8 gilescountytn.gov
Giles County, TN
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
8 washingtoncountyne.gov
Washington County, NE
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
A
8 marshallcountyillinois.gov
Marshall County, IL
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
8 stonecountyms.gov
Stone County, MS
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
8 richlandcountysc.gov
Richland County, SC
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
A
8 morriscountynj.gov
Morris County, NJ
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
A
8 geneseeny.gov
Genesee County, NY
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
A
8 salinecountymo.gov
Saline County, MO
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
A
8 barber.ks.gov
Barber County, KS
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
8 tccounty.com
Towner County, ND
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
8 lewiscountytn.com
Lewis County, TN
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
8 nicholascountywv.org
Nicholas County, WV
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
8 hamiltoncountyne.gov
Hamilton County, NE
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
8 ottertailcounty.gov
Otter Tail County, MN
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
9 polkfl.gov
Polk County, FL
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
B
9 corsoncountysd.gov
Corson County, SD
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
9 marquettecountywi.gov
Marquette County, WI
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
9 outagamie.gov
Outagamie County, WI
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
9 christiancountymo.gov
Christian County, MO
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
9 sjbparish.gov
St. John the Baptist Parish, LA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
9 cumberlandcountytn.gov
Cumberland County, TN
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
9 mckenziecountynd.gov
McKenzie County, ND
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
9 lewiscountywa.gov
Lewis County, WA
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
9 robertscosd.gov
Roberts County, SD
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
9 jacksoncountyor.gov
Jackson County, OR
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
9 pikecountymo.net
Pike County, MO
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B

Page 1 of 29

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each county government site on our county list. Scores come from the checks listed on standards.scangov.org. Sites were scanned between 7/18/2026 and 10/3/2026; each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage returned successfully and sent the scanner its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We weren't able to fully scan 421 sites because they did not respond, blocked the scanner, or returned no page content. They appear in the table without grades, each with its scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale, and rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, including every county's raw results, is published in the ScanGov data repository.