Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association: botability rankings

Botability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 9 Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 9
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 89

Average botability score of 8 fully scanned Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites

9th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average botability score

8 of 9

Michigan intercollegiate athletic association member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

B 89

Average botability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association botability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 8 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association botability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 791
80 to 892
90 to 1005

Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association by botability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic AssociationA (90 to 100): 63% (5 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 38% (3 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 71% (1,899 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 25% (660 sites)D to F (below 70): 5% (128 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association by botability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association63% (5)38% (3)0% (0)
All education sites71% (1,899)25% (660)5% (128)

Top 3 Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites by botability score

#1 in Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 1

Adrian College

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#1 in Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 1

Hope College

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#1 in Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 1

Kalamazoo College

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

Most common botability failures among Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites

Share of the 8 fully scanned Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Sitemap in robots.txt38% (3 of 8 sites)
  2. Link text38% (3 of 8 sites)
  3. Sitemap status13% (1 of 8 sites)
  4. Sitemap XML13% (1 of 8 sites)
  5. Content available in document13% (1 of 8 sites)
View the data table
Most common botability failures among Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Sitemap in robots.txt38%3
Link text38%3
Sitemap status13%1
Sitemap XML13%1
Content available in document13%1

What each check means

  • Sitemap in robots.txt. The robots.txt file links to the sitemap. Search engines take longer to find your pages.
  • Link text. Links use descriptive text that tells users and search engines where they go. Users cannot tell where links go.
  • Sitemap status. The sitemap file loads and returns a successful response. Search engines cannot find all your pages.
  • Sitemap XML. The sitemap file uses the required XML format. Search engines cannot read your sitemap.
  • Content available in document. The page's main content loads without requiring JavaScript. Bots cannot read your content.

Every education site with one problem

Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association members by botability score

Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association members ranked by botability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 adrian.edu
Adrian College U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 hope.edu
Hope College U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 kzoo.edu
Kalamazoo College U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
2 alma.edu
Alma College U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 trine.edu
Trine University U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
3 albion.edu
Albion College U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
3 saintmarys.edu
Saint Mary's College U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
4 calvin.edu
Calvin University U.S. rank 11
8 of 11 checks pass C
uolivet.edu
The University of Olivet
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo