Showing Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites. All education sites
Members of the Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
D 65
Average usability score of 8 fully scanned Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites
17th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score
8 of 9
Michigan intercollegiate athletic association member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades
D 68
Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association usability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 8 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 1 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 2 |
| 60 to 69 | 2 |
| 70 to 79 | 0 |
| 80 to 89 | 1 |
| 90 to 100 | 2 |
Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association by usability grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association | 25% (2) | 13% (1) | 63% (5) |
| All education sites | 11% (289) | 42% (1,124) | 47% (1,274) |
Top 3 Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites by usability score
#1 in Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 2
Calvin University
A 93 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability C
- Security B
- Usability A
- Readability F
#1 in Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 2
Hope College
A 93 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability A
- Readability A
#2 in Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 9
Adrian College
B 81 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability B
- Readability F
What each check means
- Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
- Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
- Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
- Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
- Open Graph title. The page has a title for social media previews. Shared links have no title on social media.
Every education site with one problem
- Education websites missing Open Graph tags: 1,859 of 2,687 fully scanned education sites (69%), with every site listed.
Michigan Intercollegiate Athletic Association members by usability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
calvin.edu
Calvin University U.S. rank 2 |
15 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
hope.edu
Hope College U.S. rank 2 |
15 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
adrian.edu
Adrian College U.S. rank 9 |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
saintmarys.edu
Saint Mary's College U.S. rank 20 |
10 of 16 checks pass | D |
| 4 |
alma.edu
Alma College U.S. rank 21 |
9 of 15 checks pass | D |
| 5 |
kzoo.edu
Kalamazoo College U.S. rank 25 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 5 |
trine.edu
Trine University U.S. rank 25 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 6 |
albion.edu
Albion College U.S. rank 34 |
5 of 16 checks pass | F |
|
uolivet.edu
The University of Olivet |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 | - |
About usability
Optimize content structure so users quickly find what they need.
Why it's important
Well-written pages help people understand laws, services, and procedures without confusion, reducing calls and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your information.
Guidance
What we use to grade usability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Google Search Central
- Web Vitals / Core Web Vitals
- Open Graph
Standards
- Page title
- Page description
- Viewport meta tag
- www resolution
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
- First Contentful Paint (FCP)
- Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- Time to First Byte (TTFB)
- Open Graph site name
- Open Graph type
- Open Graph title
- Open Graph description
- Open Graph URL
- Open Graph image
- Open Graph image alt
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.