Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf.: website rankings

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 15 Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 15
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 85

Average overall score of 15 fully scanned Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. member sites

7th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

15 of 15

Southern intercol. ath. conf. member sites fully scanned

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 15 fully scanned Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 15 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 792
80 to 899
90 to 1004

Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf.: 15 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf.A (90 to 100): 27% (4 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (11 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf.27% (4)73% (11)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 15 fully scanned Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility91All education: 91
  2. Botability89All education: 89
  3. Security87All education: 85
  4. Usability69All education: 68
  5. Readability47All education: 56
  • Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf.
  • All education
View the data table
Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorSouthern Intercol. Ath. Conf. averageAll education average
Accessibility9191
Botability8989
Security8785
Usability6968
Readability4756

Top 3 Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. member sites by overall score

#1 in Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. · U.S. education rank 5

Savannah State University

A 96 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#2 in Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. · U.S. education rank 7

Allen University

A 94 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#3 in Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. · U.S. education rank 10

Eastern Washington University

A 91 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability D
  • Readability A

Most common failures by indicator

The check Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. members by overall score

Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 savannahstate.edu
Savannah State University U.S. rank 5
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
2 allenuniversity.edu
Allen University U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
3 ewu.edu
Eastern Washington University U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
A
4 fvsu.edu
Fort Valley State University U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
5 morehouse.edu
Morehouse College U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
6 shc.edu
Spring Hill College U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
7 benedict.edu
Benedict College U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
8 loc.edu
Le Moyne-Owen College U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
9 cau.edu
Clark Atlanta University U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
9 tuskegee.edu
Tuskegee University U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
10 asurams.edu
Albany State University U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
10 centralstate.edu
Central State University U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
10 lanecollege.edu
Lane College U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
11 miles.edu
Miles College U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
12 kysu.edu
Kentucky State University U.S. rank 24
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo