Southern Conference websites ranked by digital experience

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 11 Southern Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 11
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Southern Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 88

Average overall score of 10 fully scanned Southern Conference member sites

4th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

10 of 11

Southern conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Southern Conference overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 10 fully scanned Southern Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 10 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Southern Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Southern Conference overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 896
90 to 1004

Southern Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Southern Conference: 10 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Southern ConferenceA (90 to 100): 40% (4 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 60% (6 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Southern Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Southern Conference40% (4)60% (6)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

Southern Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 10 fully scanned Southern Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility95All education: 91
  2. Botability93All education: 89
  3. Security81All education: 85
  4. Usability73All education: 68
  5. Readability80All education: 56
  • Southern Conference
  • All education
View the data table
Southern Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorSouthern Conference averageAll education average
Accessibility9591
Botability9389
Security8185
Usability7368
Readability8056

Top 3 Southern Conference member sites by overall score

#1 in Southern Conference · U.S. education rank 5

Mercer University

A 96 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#2 in Southern Conference · U.S. education rank 7

Citadel Military College of South Carolina

A 94 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#3 in Southern Conference · U.S. education rank 10

Furman University

A 91 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

Most common failures by indicator

The check Southern Conference member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

Southern Conference members by overall score

Southern Conference members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 mercer.edu
Mercer University U.S. rank 5
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
2 citadel.edu
Citadel Military College of South Carolina U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
3 furman.edu
Furman University U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
3 vmi.edu
Virginia Military Institute U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
4 etsu.edu
East Tennessee State University U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade D
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
B
5 wcu.edu
Western Carolina University U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
6 samford.edu
Samford University U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
7 tntech.edu
Tennessee Technological University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
8 utc.edu
The University of Tennessee-Chattanooga U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
9 wofford.edu
Wofford College U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
uncg.edu
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because the page never finished loading in our browser. Status 994 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/28/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo