Showing Southern Conference member sites. All education sites
Members of the Southern Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
C 73
Average usability score of 10 fully scanned Southern Conference member sites
9th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score
10 of 11
Southern conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades
D 68
Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Southern Conference usability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 10 fully scanned Southern Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 10 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Southern Conference average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 1 |
| 50 to 59 | 2 |
| 60 to 69 | 2 |
| 70 to 79 | 0 |
| 80 to 89 | 2 |
| 90 to 100 | 3 |
Southern Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Southern Conference: 10 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Southern Conference | 30% (3) | 20% (2) | 50% (5) |
| All education sites | 11% (289) | 42% (1,124) | 47% (1,274) |
Top 3 Southern Conference member sites by usability score
#1 in Southern Conference · U.S. education rank 1
Mercer University
A 100 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability A
- Readability A
#2 in Southern Conference · U.S. education rank 2
East Tennessee State University
A 93 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security D
- Usability A
- Readability A
#2 in Southern Conference · U.S. education rank 2
Furman University
A 93 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability A
- Readability F
What each check means
- Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
- First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
- Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
- Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
Every education site with one problem
- Education websites missing Open Graph tags: 1,859 of 2,687 fully scanned education sites (69%), with every site listed.
Southern Conference members by usability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
mercer.edu
Mercer University U.S. rank 1 |
16 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
etsu.edu
East Tennessee State University U.S. rank 2 |
15 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
furman.edu
Furman University U.S. rank 2 |
15 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 3 |
citadel.edu
Citadel Military College of South Carolina U.S. rank 5 |
13 of 15 checks pass | B |
| 4 |
vmi.edu
Virginia Military Institute U.S. rank 10 |
12 of 15 checks pass | B |
| 5 |
tntech.edu
Tennessee Technological University U.S. rank 18 |
10 of 15 checks pass | D |
| 6 |
wcu.edu
Western Carolina University U.S. rank 21 |
9 of 15 checks pass | D |
| 7 |
samford.edu
Samford University U.S. rank 23 |
9 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 7 |
wofford.edu
Wofford College U.S. rank 23 |
9 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 8 |
utc.edu
The University of Tennessee-Chattanooga U.S. rank 29 |
6 of 15 checks pass | F |
|
uncg.edu
University of North Carolina at Greensboro |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because the page never finished loading in our browser. Status 994 | - |
About usability
Optimize content structure so users quickly find what they need.
Why it's important
Well-written pages help people understand laws, services, and procedures without confusion, reducing calls and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your information.
Guidance
What we use to grade usability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Google Search Central
- Web Vitals / Core Web Vitals
- Open Graph
Standards
- Page title
- Page description
- Viewport meta tag
- www resolution
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
- First Contentful Paint (FCP)
- Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- Time to First Byte (TTFB)
- Open Graph site name
- Open Graph type
- Open Graph title
- Open Graph description
- Open Graph URL
- Open Graph image
- Open Graph image alt
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/28/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.