Showing Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference member sites. All education sites
Members of the Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
C 75
Average usability score of 10 fully scanned Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference member sites
7th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score
10 of 10
Southern collegiate athletic conference member sites fully scanned
D 68
Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference usability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 10 fully scanned Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 10 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 2 |
| 60 to 69 | 2 |
| 70 to 79 | 0 |
| 80 to 89 | 4 |
| 90 to 100 | 2 |
Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference: 10 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference | 20% (2) | 40% (4) | 40% (4) |
| All education sites | 11% (289) | 42% (1,124) | 47% (1,274) |
Top 3 Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference member sites by usability score
#1 in Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 2
Hendrix College
A 93 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability A
- Readability A
#1 in Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 2
University of the Ozarks
A 93 usability
- Accessibility B
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability A
- Readability A
#2 in Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 4
Colorado College
B 87 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability B
- Security A
- Usability B
- Readability A
What each check means
- Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
- Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
- Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
- First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
Every education site with one problem
- Education websites missing Open Graph tags: 1,859 of 2,687 fully scanned education sites (69%), with every site listed.
Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference members by usability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
via.hendrix.edu
Hendrix College U.S. rank 2 |
15 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
ozarks.edu
University of the Ozarks U.S. rank 2 |
15 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
coloradocollege.edu
Colorado College U.S. rank 4 |
14 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
concordia.edu
Concordia University Texas U.S. rank 9 |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
tlu.edu
Texas Lutheran University U.S. rank 9 |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
stthom.edu
University of St Thomas U.S. rank 9 |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 4 |
centenary.edu
Centenary College of Louisiana U.S. rank 17 |
11 of 16 checks pass | D |
| 5 |
udallas.edu
University of Dallas U.S. rank 20 |
10 of 16 checks pass | D |
| 6 |
austincollege.edu
Austin College U.S. rank 23 |
9 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 7 |
letu.edu
LeTourneau University U.S. rank 25 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
About usability
Optimize content structure so users quickly find what they need.
Why it's important
Well-written pages help people understand laws, services, and procedures without confusion, reducing calls and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your information.
Guidance
What we use to grade usability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Google Search Central
- Web Vitals / Core Web Vitals
- Open Graph
Standards
- Page title
- Page description
- Viewport meta tag
- www resolution
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
- First Contentful Paint (FCP)
- Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- Time to First Byte (TTFB)
- Open Graph site name
- Open Graph type
- Open Graph title
- Open Graph description
- Open Graph URL
- Open Graph image
- Open Graph image alt
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.