Showing Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. member sites. All education sites
Members of the Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
C 74
Average usability score of 8 fully scanned Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. member sites
8th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score
8 of 8
Southern california intercollegiate athletic conf. member sites fully scanned
D 68
Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. usability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 8 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 3 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 1 |
| 80 to 89 | 3 |
| 90 to 100 | 1 |
Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. by usability grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf.: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. | 13% (1) | 50% (4) | 38% (3) |
| All education sites | 11% (289) | 42% (1,124) | 47% (1,274) |
Top 3 Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. member sites by usability score
#1 in Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. · U.S. education rank 1
California Institute of Technology
A 100 usability
- Accessibility B
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability A
- Readability A
#2 in Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. · U.S. education rank 4
Chapman University
B 87 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability B
- Security D
- Usability B
- Readability F
#3 in Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. · U.S. education rank 5
Pitzer College
B 86 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability B
- Readability A
What each check means
- Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
- Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
- Open Graph type. The page declares its content type for social media cards. Social media shows wrong content type.
- Time to First Byte (TTFB). The server sends the first byte of content within 0.8 seconds. Slow server delays everything on your page.
- Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
Every education site with one problem
- Education websites missing Open Graph tags: 1,859 of 2,687 fully scanned education sites (69%), with every site listed.
Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. members by usability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
caltech.edu
California Institute of Technology U.S. rank 1 |
16 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
chapman.edu
Chapman University U.S. rank 4 |
14 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
pitzer.edu
Pitzer College U.S. rank 5 |
13 of 15 checks pass | B |
| 4 |
redlands.edu
University of Redlands U.S. rank 9 |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 5 |
callutheran.edu
California Lutheran University U.S. rank 13 |
12 of 16 checks pass | C |
| 6 |
apu.edu
Azusa Pacific University U.S. rank 23 |
9 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 6 |
whittier.edu
Whittier College U.S. rank 23 |
9 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 7 |
oxy.edu
Occidental College U.S. rank 25 |
8 of 16 checks pass | F |
About usability
Optimize content structure so users quickly find what they need.
Why it's important
Well-written pages help people understand laws, services, and procedures without confusion, reducing calls and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your information.
Guidance
What we use to grade usability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Google Search Central
- Web Vitals / Core Web Vitals
- Open Graph
Standards
- Page title
- Page description
- Viewport meta tag
- www resolution
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
- First Contentful Paint (FCP)
- Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- Time to First Byte (TTFB)
- Open Graph site name
- Open Graph type
- Open Graph title
- Open Graph description
- Open Graph URL
- Open Graph image
- Open Graph image alt
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.