Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf.: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 8 Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 8
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

C 74

Average usability score of 8 fully scanned Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. member sites

8th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

8 of 8

Southern california intercollegiate athletic conf. member sites fully scanned

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 8 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 593
60 to 690
70 to 791
80 to 893
90 to 1001

Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf.: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf.A (90 to 100): 13% (1 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 50% (4 sites)D to F (below 70): 38% (3 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 11% (289 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 42% (1,124 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (1,274 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. by usability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf.13% (1)50% (4)38% (3)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. member sites by usability score

#1 in Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. · U.S. education rank 1

California Institute of Technology

A 100 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#2 in Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. · U.S. education rank 4

Chapman University

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security D
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#3 in Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. · U.S. education rank 5

Pitzer College

B 86 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

Most common usability failures among Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. member sites

Share of the 8 fully scanned Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph site name75% (6 of 8 sites)
  2. Open Graph image alt63% (5 of 8 sites)
  3. Open Graph type50% (4 of 8 sites)
  4. Time to First Byte (TTFB)38% (3 of 8 sites)
  5. Open Graph description38% (3 of 8 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph site name75%6
Open Graph image alt63%5
Open Graph type50%4
Time to First Byte (TTFB)38%3
Open Graph description38%3

What each check means

  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Open Graph type. The page declares its content type for social media cards. Social media shows wrong content type.
  • Time to First Byte (TTFB). The server sends the first byte of content within 0.8 seconds. Slow server delays everything on your page.
  • Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.

Every education site with one problem

Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. members by usability score

Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conf. members ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 caltech.edu
California Institute of Technology U.S. rank 1
16 of 16 checks pass A
2 chapman.edu
Chapman University U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
3 pitzer.edu
Pitzer College U.S. rank 5
13 of 15 checks pass B
4 redlands.edu
University of Redlands U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
5 callutheran.edu
California Lutheran University U.S. rank 13
12 of 16 checks pass C
6 apu.edu
Azusa Pacific University U.S. rank 23
9 of 16 checks pass F
6 whittier.edu
Whittier College U.S. rank 23
9 of 16 checks pass F
7 oxy.edu
Occidental College U.S. rank 25
8 of 16 checks pass F

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo