Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf.: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 15 Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 15
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

D 69

Average usability score of 15 fully scanned Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. member sites

13th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

15 of 15

Southern intercol. ath. conf. member sites fully scanned

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 15 fully scanned Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 15 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 391
40 to 491
50 to 593
60 to 692
70 to 791
80 to 896
90 to 1001

Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf.: 15 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf.A (90 to 100): 7% (1 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 47% (7 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (7 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 11% (289 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 42% (1,124 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (1,274 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. by usability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf.7% (1)47% (7)47% (7)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. member sites by usability score

#1 in Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. · U.S. education rank 1

Savannah State University

A 100 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#2 in Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. · U.S. education rank 4

Allen University

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#2 in Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. · U.S. education rank 4

Tuskegee University

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability D
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

Most common usability failures among Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. member sites

Share of the 15 fully scanned Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt73% (11 of 15 sites)
  2. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)47% (7 of 15 sites)
  3. Open Graph image47% (7 of 15 sites)
  4. Open Graph site name47% (7 of 15 sites)
  5. Open Graph type47% (7 of 15 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt73%11
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)47%7
Open Graph image47%7
Open Graph site name47%7
Open Graph type47%7

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
  • Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
  • Open Graph type. The page declares its content type for social media cards. Social media shows wrong content type.

Every education site with one problem

Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. members by usability score

Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. members ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 savannahstate.edu
Savannah State University U.S. rank 1
16 of 16 checks pass A
2 allenuniversity.edu
Allen University U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
2 tuskegee.edu
Tuskegee University U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
3 benedict.edu
Benedict College U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
3 fvsu.edu
Fort Valley State University U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
3 morehouse.edu
Morehouse College U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
3 shc.edu
Spring Hill College U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
4 lanecollege.edu
Lane College U.S. rank 13
12 of 16 checks pass C
5 loc.edu
Le Moyne-Owen College U.S. rank 17
11 of 16 checks pass D
6 ewu.edu
Eastern Washington University U.S. rank 18
10 of 15 checks pass D
7 cau.edu
Clark Atlanta University U.S. rank 24
8 of 15 checks pass F
8 asurams.edu
Albany State University U.S. rank 25
8 of 16 checks pass F
8 miles.edu
Miles College U.S. rank 25
8 of 16 checks pass F
9 centralstate.edu
Central State University U.S. rank 29
6 of 15 checks pass F
10 kysu.edu
Kentucky State University U.S. rank 34
5 of 16 checks pass F

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo