Showing Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. member sites. All education sites
Members of the Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
B 87
Average security score of 15 fully scanned Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. member sites
7th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average security score
15 of 15
Southern intercol. ath. conf. member sites fully scanned
B 85
Average security score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. security scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 15 fully scanned Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 15 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 4 |
| 80 to 89 | 8 |
| 90 to 100 | 3 |
Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. by security grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf.: 15 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. | 20% (3) | 80% (12) | 0% (0) |
| All education sites | 19% (505) | 79% (2,113) | 3% (69) |
Top 3 Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. member sites by security score
#1 in Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. · U.S. education rank 1
Central State University
A 100 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability B
- Security A
- Usability F
- Readability A
#1 in Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. · U.S. education rank 1
Kentucky State University
A 100 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability B
- Security A
- Usability F
- Readability F
#1 in Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. · U.S. education rank 1
Miles College
A 100 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability B
- Security A
- Usability F
- Readability F
What each check means
- X-Content-Type-Options. The site tells browsers not to guess the type of files it serves. Browsers might run dangerous files by mistake.
- Errors in the console. The page loads without JavaScript or network errors. Site may have hidden bugs that break features.
- Security.txt. The site has a security.txt file so researchers know how to report issues. Security researchers cannot report problems to you.
Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. members by security score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
centralstate.edu
Central State University U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
kysu.edu
Kentucky State University U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
miles.edu
Miles College U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
allenuniversity.edu
Allen University U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
benedict.edu
Benedict College U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
ewu.edu
Eastern Washington University U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
lanecollege.edu
Lane College U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
loc.edu
Le Moyne-Owen College U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
morehouse.edu
Morehouse College U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
savannahstate.edu
Savannah State University U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
shc.edu
Spring Hill College U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
fvsu.edu
Fort Valley State University U.S. rank 5 |
7 of 9 checks pass | C |
| 4 |
asurams.edu
Albany State University U.S. rank 6 |
6 of 8 checks pass | C |
| 4 |
cau.edu
Clark Atlanta University U.S. rank 6 |
6 of 8 checks pass | C |
| 4 |
tuskegee.edu
Tuskegee University U.S. rank 6 |
6 of 8 checks pass | C |
About security
Secure your site and protect users with proper security practices.
Why it's important
Strong defenses prevent hackers from stealing personal information and other confidential data.
Risks
- Hackers can steal private information from your site.
Guidance
What we use to grade security:
- CISA Website Security
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- CISA Cybersecurity Performance Goals
- RFC 9116
- OWASP Top 10
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
Standards
- Content security policy (CSP)
- HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)
- security.txt
- X-Content-Type-Options
- Errors in the console
- Clickjacking mitigation
- Paste preventing inputs
- Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure (HTTPS)
- Sponsored top-level domain (sTLD)
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.