Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf.: botability rankings

Botability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 15 Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 15
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 89

Average botability score of 15 fully scanned Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. member sites

9th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average botability score

15 of 15

Southern intercol. ath. conf. member sites fully scanned

B 89

Average botability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. botability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 15 fully scanned Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 15 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. botability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 691
70 to 790
80 to 894
90 to 10010

Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. by botability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf.: 15 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf.A (90 to 100): 67% (10 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 27% (4 sites)D to F (below 70): 7% (1 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 71% (1,899 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 25% (660 sites)D to F (below 70): 5% (128 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. by botability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf.67% (10)27% (4)7% (1)
All education sites71% (1,899)25% (660)5% (128)

Top 3 Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. member sites by botability score

#1 in Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. · U.S. education rank 1

Albany State University

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

#1 in Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. · U.S. education rank 1

Allen University

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#1 in Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. · U.S. education rank 1

Eastern Washington University

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability D
  • Readability A

Most common botability failures among Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. member sites

Share of the 15 fully scanned Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Link text67% (10 of 15 sites)
  2. Sitemap in robots.txt33% (5 of 15 sites)
  3. Sitemap status7% (1 of 15 sites)
  4. Sitemap XML7% (1 of 15 sites)
View the data table
Most common botability failures among Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Link text67%10
Sitemap in robots.txt33%5
Sitemap status7%1
Sitemap XML7%1

What each check means

  • Link text. Links use descriptive text that tells users and search engines where they go. Users cannot tell where links go.
  • Sitemap in robots.txt. The robots.txt file links to the sitemap. Search engines take longer to find your pages.
  • Sitemap status. The sitemap file loads and returns a successful response. Search engines cannot find all your pages.
  • Sitemap XML. The sitemap file uses the required XML format. Search engines cannot read your sitemap.

Every education site with one problem

Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. members by botability score

Southern Intercol. Ath. Conf. members ranked by botability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 asurams.edu
Albany State University U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 allenuniversity.edu
Allen University U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 ewu.edu
Eastern Washington University U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 savannahstate.edu
Savannah State University U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
2 benedict.edu
Benedict College U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 cau.edu
Clark Atlanta University U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 fvsu.edu
Fort Valley State University U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 lanecollege.edu
Lane College U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 loc.edu
Le Moyne-Owen College U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 shc.edu
Spring Hill College U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
3 centralstate.edu
Central State University U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
3 kysu.edu
Kentucky State University U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
3 miles.edu
Miles College U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
3 morehouse.edu
Morehouse College U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
4 tuskegee.edu
Tuskegee University U.S. rank 14
6 of 9 checks pass D

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo