Showing Southland Conference member sites. All education sites
Members of the Southland Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
B 89
Average security score of 7 fully scanned Southland Conference member sites
5th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average security score
7 of 11
Southland conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 4, so they're listed without grades
B 85
Average security score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Southland Conference security scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 7 fully scanned Southland Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 7 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Southland Conference average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 0 |
| 80 to 89 | 6 |
| 90 to 100 | 1 |
Southland Conference by security grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Southland Conference: 7 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Southland Conference | 14% (1) | 86% (6) | 0% (0) |
| All education sites | 19% (505) | 79% (2,113) | 3% (69) |
Top 3 Southland Conference member sites by security score
#1 in Southland Conference · U.S. education rank 1
Northwestern State University of Louisiana
A 100 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability C
- Readability A
#2 in Southland Conference · U.S. education rank 2
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
B 88 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability D
- Security B
- Usability B
- Readability F
#3 in Southland Conference · U.S. education rank 3
Lamar University
B 87 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability D
- Security B
- Usability B
- Readability A
What each check means
- X-Content-Type-Options. The site tells browsers not to guess the type of files it serves. Browsers might run dangerous files by mistake.
- Errors in the console. The page loads without JavaScript or network errors. Site may have hidden bugs that break features.
- Security.txt. The site has a security.txt file so researchers know how to report issues. Security researchers cannot report problems to you.
Southland Conference members by security score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
nsula.edu
Northwestern State University of Louisiana U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
utrgv.edu
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley U.S. rank 2 |
8 of 9 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
lamar.edu
Lamar University U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
southeastern.edu
Southeastern Louisiana University U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
sfasu.edu
Stephen F Austin State University U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
tamucc.edu
Texas A & M University-Corpus Christi U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
uiw.edu
University of the Incarnate Word U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
|
hc.edu
Houston Christian University |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 | - | |
|
mcneese.edu
McNeese State University |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 | - | |
|
nicholls.edu
Nicholls State University |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asks crawlers to wait longer than we can. Status 997 | - | |
|
new.uno.edu
University of New Orleans |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because its security certificate didn't pass validation. Status 993 | - |
About security
Secure your site and protect users with proper security practices.
Why it's important
Strong defenses prevent hackers from stealing personal information and other confidential data.
Risks
- Hackers can steal private information from your site.
Guidance
What we use to grade security:
- CISA Website Security
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- CISA Cybersecurity Performance Goals
- RFC 9116
- OWASP Top 10
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
Standards
- Content security policy (CSP)
- HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)
- security.txt
- X-Content-Type-Options
- Errors in the console
- Clickjacking mitigation
- Paste preventing inputs
- Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure (HTTPS)
- Sponsored top-level domain (sTLD)
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/7/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 4 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.