Great Midwest Athletic Conference: website rankings

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 12 Great Midwest Athletic Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 12
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Great Midwest Athletic Conference (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 87

Average overall score of 11 fully scanned Great Midwest Athletic Conference member sites

5th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

11 of 12

Great midwest athletic conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Great Midwest Athletic Conference overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 11 fully scanned Great Midwest Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 11 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Great Midwest Athletic Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Great Midwest Athletic Conference overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 791
80 to 895
90 to 1005

Great Midwest Athletic Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Great Midwest Athletic Conference: 11 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Great Midwest Athletic ConferenceA (90 to 100): 45% (5 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 55% (6 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Great Midwest Athletic Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Great Midwest Athletic Conference45% (5)55% (6)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

Great Midwest Athletic Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 11 fully scanned Great Midwest Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility91All education: 91
  2. Botability92All education: 89
  3. Security89All education: 85
  4. Usability75All education: 68
  5. Readability70All education: 56
  • Great Midwest Athletic Conference
  • All education
View the data table
Great Midwest Athletic Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorGreat Midwest Athletic Conference averageAll education average
Accessibility9191
Botability9289
Security8985
Usability7568
Readability7056

Top 3 Great Midwest Athletic Conference member sites by overall score

#1 in Great Midwest Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 8

Lake Erie College

A 93 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#2 in Great Midwest Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 10

Kentucky Wesleyan College

A 91 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#3 in Great Midwest Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 11

Hillsdale College

A 90 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability -

Most common failures by indicator

The check Great Midwest Athletic Conference member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

Great Midwest Athletic Conference members by overall score

Great Midwest Athletic Conference members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 lec.edu
Lake Erie College U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
2 kwc.edu
Kentucky Wesleyan College U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
3 hillsdale.edu
Hillsdale College U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade -
A
3 findlay.edu
The University of Findlay U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
3 tiffin.edu
Tiffin University U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
4 thomasmore.edu
Thomas More University U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
5 cedarville.edu
Cedarville University U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
6 ursuline.edu
Ursuline College U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
7 ohiodominican.edu
Ohio Dominican University U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
8 ashland.edu
Ashland University U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
9 walsh.edu
Walsh University U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
northwood.edu
Northwood University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo