Great Midwest Athletic Conference: botability rankings

Botability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 12 Great Midwest Athletic Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 12
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Great Midwest Athletic Conference (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

A 92

Average botability score of 11 fully scanned Great Midwest Athletic Conference member sites

6th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average botability score

11 of 12

Great midwest athletic conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

B 89

Average botability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Great Midwest Athletic Conference botability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 11 fully scanned Great Midwest Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 11 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Great Midwest Athletic Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Great Midwest Athletic Conference botability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 791
80 to 892
90 to 1008

Great Midwest Athletic Conference by botability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Great Midwest Athletic Conference: 11 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Great Midwest Athletic ConferenceA (90 to 100): 73% (8 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 27% (3 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 71% (1,899 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 25% (660 sites)D to F (below 70): 5% (128 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Great Midwest Athletic Conference by botability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Great Midwest Athletic Conference73% (8)27% (3)0% (0)
All education sites71% (1,899)25% (660)5% (128)

Top 3 Great Midwest Athletic Conference member sites by botability score

#1 in Great Midwest Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Cedarville University

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#1 in Great Midwest Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Kentucky Wesleyan College

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#1 in Great Midwest Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Ohio Dominican University

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

Most common botability failures among Great Midwest Athletic Conference member sites

Share of the 11 fully scanned Great Midwest Athletic Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Link text45% (5 of 11 sites)
  2. Sitemap in robots.txt18% (2 of 11 sites)
  3. Sitemap status9% (1 of 11 sites)
  4. Sitemap XML9% (1 of 11 sites)
View the data table
Most common botability failures among Great Midwest Athletic Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Link text45%5
Sitemap in robots.txt18%2
Sitemap status9%1
Sitemap XML9%1

What each check means

  • Link text. Links use descriptive text that tells users and search engines where they go. Users cannot tell where links go.
  • Sitemap in robots.txt. The robots.txt file links to the sitemap. Search engines take longer to find your pages.
  • Sitemap status. The sitemap file loads and returns a successful response. Search engines cannot find all your pages.
  • Sitemap XML. The sitemap file uses the required XML format. Search engines cannot read your sitemap.

Every education site with one problem

Great Midwest Athletic Conference members by botability score

Great Midwest Athletic Conference members ranked by botability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 cedarville.edu
Cedarville University U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 kwc.edu
Kentucky Wesleyan College U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 ohiodominican.edu
Ohio Dominican University U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 tiffin.edu
Tiffin University U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 ursuline.edu
Ursuline College U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
2 lec.edu
Lake Erie College U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 findlay.edu
The University of Findlay U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 thomasmore.edu
Thomas More University U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
3 walsh.edu
Walsh University U.S. rank 3
8 of 9 checks pass B
4 hillsdale.edu
Hillsdale College U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
5 ashland.edu
Ashland University U.S. rank 11
8 of 11 checks pass C
northwood.edu
Northwood University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo