Great Midwest Athletic Conference: readability rankings

Readability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 12 Great Midwest Athletic Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 12
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Great Midwest Athletic Conference (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

C 70

Average readability score of 11 fully scanned Great Midwest Athletic Conference member sites

9th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average readability score

11 of 12

Great midwest athletic conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

F 56

Average readability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Great Midwest Athletic Conference readability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 11 fully scanned Great Midwest Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 10 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Great Midwest Athletic Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Great Midwest Athletic Conference readability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 93
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 890
90 to 1007

Great Midwest Athletic Conference by readability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Great Midwest Athletic Conference: 11 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Great Midwest Athletic ConferenceA (90 to 100): 64% (7 sites)D to F (below 70): 27% (3 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 53% (1,425 sites)D to F (below 70): 41% (1,110 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Great Midwest Athletic Conference by readability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Great Midwest Athletic Conference64% (7)0% (0)27% (3)
All education sites53% (1,425)0% (0)41% (1,110)

Top 3 Great Midwest Athletic Conference member sites by readability score

#1 in Great Midwest Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Kentucky Wesleyan College

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#1 in Great Midwest Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Lake Erie College

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#1 in Great Midwest Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Ohio Dominican University

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

Most common readability failures among Great Midwest Athletic Conference member sites

Share of the 11 fully scanned Great Midwest Athletic Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Reading level27% (3 of 11 sites)
View the data table
Most common readability failures among Great Midwest Athletic Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Reading level27%3

What each check means

  • Reading level. Page text reads at or below a 7th grade level so most users can understand it. Users struggle to understand your content.

Every education site with one problem

Great Midwest Athletic Conference members by readability score

Great Midwest Athletic Conference members ranked by readability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 kwc.edu
Kentucky Wesleyan College U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 lec.edu
Lake Erie College U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 ohiodominican.edu
Ohio Dominican University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 thomasmore.edu
Thomas More University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 tiffin.edu
Tiffin University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 ursuline.edu
Ursuline College U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 walsh.edu
Walsh University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
4 ashland.edu
Ashland University U.S. rank 162
0 of 1 checks pass F
4 cedarville.edu
Cedarville University U.S. rank 72
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 findlay.edu
The University of Findlay U.S. rank 46
0 of 1 checks pass F
3 hillsdale.edu
Hillsdale College U.S. rank 47
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We were able to fully scan your site. Status 200 -
northwood.edu
Northwood University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo