Great Lakes Valley Conference: botability rankings

Botability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 15 Great Lakes Valley Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 15
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Great Lakes Valley Conference (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 88

Average botability score of 15 fully scanned Great Lakes Valley Conference member sites

10th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average botability score

15 of 15

Great lakes valley conference member sites fully scanned

B 89

Average botability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Great Lakes Valley Conference botability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 15 fully scanned Great Lakes Valley Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 15 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Great Lakes Valley Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Great Lakes Valley Conference botability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 692
70 to 792
80 to 891
90 to 10010

Great Lakes Valley Conference by botability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Great Lakes Valley Conference: 15 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Great Lakes Valley ConferenceA (90 to 100): 67% (10 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 20% (3 sites)D to F (below 70): 13% (2 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 71% (1,899 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 25% (660 sites)D to F (below 70): 5% (128 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Great Lakes Valley Conference by botability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Great Lakes Valley Conference67% (10)20% (3)13% (2)
All education sites71% (1,899)25% (660)5% (128)

Top 3 Great Lakes Valley Conference member sites by botability score

#1 in Great Lakes Valley Conference · U.S. education rank 1

McKendree University

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

#1 in Great Lakes Valley Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Quincy University

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#1 in Great Lakes Valley Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Southwest Baptist University

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

Most common botability failures among Great Lakes Valley Conference member sites

Share of the 15 fully scanned Great Lakes Valley Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Sitemap in robots.txt47% (7 of 15 sites)
  2. Sitemap status20% (3 of 15 sites)
  3. Sitemap XML20% (3 of 15 sites)
  4. Content available in document13% (2 of 15 sites)
  5. Link text13% (2 of 15 sites)
View the data table
Most common botability failures among Great Lakes Valley Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Sitemap in robots.txt47%7
Sitemap status20%3
Sitemap XML20%3
Content available in document13%2
Link text13%2

What each check means

  • Sitemap in robots.txt. The robots.txt file links to the sitemap. Search engines take longer to find your pages.
  • Sitemap status. The sitemap file loads and returns a successful response. Search engines cannot find all your pages.
  • Sitemap XML. The sitemap file uses the required XML format. Search engines cannot read your sitemap.
  • Content available in document. The page's main content loads without requiring JavaScript. Bots cannot read your content.
  • Link text. Links use descriptive text that tells users and search engines where they go. Users cannot tell where links go.

Every education site with one problem

Great Lakes Valley Conference members by botability score

Great Lakes Valley Conference members ranked by botability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 mckendree.edu
McKendree University U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 quincy.edu
Quincy University U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 sbuniv.edu
Southwest Baptist University U.S. rank 1
9 of 9 checks pass A
1 truman.edu
Truman State University U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 uindy.edu
University of Indianapolis U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 uiu.edu
Upper Iowa University U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 jewell.edu
William Jewell College U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
2 lincolnu.edu
Lincoln University U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 rockhurst.edu
Rockhurst University U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 uis.edu
University of Illinois Springfield U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
3 drury.edu
Drury University U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
4 mst.edu
Missouri University of Science and Technology U.S. rank 9
7 of 9 checks pass C
5 lewisu.edu
Lewis University U.S. rank 11
8 of 11 checks pass C
6 maryville.edu
Maryville University of Saint Louis U.S. rank 15
7 of 11 checks pass D
6 umsl.edu
University of Missouri-St Louis U.S. rank 15
7 of 11 checks pass D

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/28/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo