Great Lakes Valley Conference: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 15 Great Lakes Valley Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 15
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Great Lakes Valley Conference (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

D 69

Average usability score of 15 fully scanned Great Lakes Valley Conference member sites

13th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

15 of 15

Great lakes valley conference member sites fully scanned

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Great Lakes Valley Conference usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 15 fully scanned Great Lakes Valley Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 15 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Great Lakes Valley Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Great Lakes Valley Conference usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 492
50 to 594
60 to 691
70 to 792
80 to 895
90 to 1001

Great Lakes Valley Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Great Lakes Valley Conference: 15 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Great Lakes Valley ConferenceA (90 to 100): 7% (1 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 47% (7 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (7 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 11% (289 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 42% (1,124 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (1,274 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Great Lakes Valley Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Great Lakes Valley Conference7% (1)47% (7)47% (7)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 Great Lakes Valley Conference member sites by usability score

#1 in Great Lakes Valley Conference · U.S. education rank 2

Upper Iowa University

A 93 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#2 in Great Lakes Valley Conference · U.S. education rank 4

Maryville University of Saint Louis

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability D
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#2 in Great Lakes Valley Conference · U.S. education rank 4

Quincy University

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

Most common usability failures among Great Lakes Valley Conference member sites

Share of the 15 fully scanned Great Lakes Valley Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt93% (14 of 15 sites)
  2. Open Graph description47% (7 of 15 sites)
  3. Open Graph image47% (7 of 15 sites)
  4. Open Graph type47% (7 of 15 sites)
  5. Open Graph URL47% (7 of 15 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among Great Lakes Valley Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt93%14
Open Graph description47%7
Open Graph image47%7
Open Graph type47%7
Open Graph URL47%7

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
  • Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
  • Open Graph type. The page declares its content type for social media cards. Social media shows wrong content type.
  • Open Graph URL. The page has a canonical URL for social media sharing. Shared links may point to wrong page.

Every education site with one problem

Great Lakes Valley Conference members by usability score

Great Lakes Valley Conference members ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 uiu.edu
Upper Iowa University U.S. rank 2
15 of 16 checks pass A
2 maryville.edu
Maryville University of Saint Louis U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
2 quincy.edu
Quincy University U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
3 rockhurst.edu
Rockhurst University U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
3 jewell.edu
William Jewell College U.S. rank 9
13 of 16 checks pass B
4 lincolnu.edu
Lincoln University U.S. rank 10
12 of 15 checks pass B
5 drury.edu
Drury University U.S. rank 13
12 of 16 checks pass C
6 truman.edu
Truman State University U.S. rank 15
10 of 14 checks pass C
7 mst.edu
Missouri University of Science and Technology U.S. rank 17
11 of 16 checks pass D
8 lewisu.edu
Lewis University U.S. rank 23
9 of 16 checks pass F
8 mckendree.edu
McKendree University U.S. rank 23
9 of 16 checks pass F
8 sbuniv.edu
Southwest Baptist University U.S. rank 23
9 of 16 checks pass F
8 uindy.edu
University of Indianapolis U.S. rank 23
9 of 16 checks pass F
9 uis.edu
University of Illinois Springfield U.S. rank 27
7 of 16 checks pass F
10 umsl.edu
University of Missouri-St Louis U.S. rank 29
6 of 15 checks pass F

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/28/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo