Great Lakes Valley Conference: website rankings

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 15 Great Lakes Valley Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 15
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Great Lakes Valley Conference (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 86

Average overall score of 15 fully scanned Great Lakes Valley Conference member sites

6th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

15 of 15

Great lakes valley conference member sites fully scanned

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Great Lakes Valley Conference overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 15 fully scanned Great Lakes Valley Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 15 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Great Lakes Valley Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Great Lakes Valley Conference overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 793
80 to 899
90 to 1003

Great Lakes Valley Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Great Lakes Valley Conference: 15 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Great Lakes Valley ConferenceA (90 to 100): 20% (3 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 80% (12 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Great Lakes Valley Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Great Lakes Valley Conference20% (3)80% (12)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

Great Lakes Valley Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 15 fully scanned Great Lakes Valley Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility94All education: 91
  2. Botability88All education: 89
  3. Security83All education: 85
  4. Usability69All education: 68
  5. Readability73All education: 56
  • Great Lakes Valley Conference
  • All education
View the data table
Great Lakes Valley Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorGreat Lakes Valley Conference averageAll education average
Accessibility9491
Botability8889
Security8385
Usability6968
Readability7356

Top 3 Great Lakes Valley Conference member sites by overall score

#1 in Great Lakes Valley Conference · U.S. education rank 4

Upper Iowa University

A 97 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#2 in Great Lakes Valley Conference · U.S. education rank 7

Quincy University

A 94 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#3 in Great Lakes Valley Conference · U.S. education rank 9

William Jewell College

A 92 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

Most common failures by indicator

The check Great Lakes Valley Conference member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

Great Lakes Valley Conference members by overall score

Great Lakes Valley Conference members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 uiu.edu
Upper Iowa University U.S. rank 4
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
2 quincy.edu
Quincy University U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
3 jewell.edu
William Jewell College U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
4 lincolnu.edu
Lincoln University U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
5 truman.edu
Truman State University U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
5 uindy.edu
University of Indianapolis U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
6 maryville.edu
Maryville University of Saint Louis U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
7 mckendree.edu
McKendree University U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
7 rockhurst.edu
Rockhurst University U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
8 sbuniv.edu
Southwest Baptist University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
8 uis.edu
University of Illinois Springfield U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
9 drury.edu
Drury University U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
B
10 umsl.edu
University of Missouri-St Louis U.S. rank 23
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
11 mst.edu
Missouri University of Science and Technology U.S. rank 24
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
C
12 lewisu.edu
Lewis University U.S. rank 26
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/28/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo