Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference: website rankings

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 11 Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 11
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 89

Average overall score of 11 fully scanned Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites

3rd

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

11 of 11

Great lakes intercollegiate athletic conference member sites fully scanned

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 11 fully scanned Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 11 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 896
90 to 1005

Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference: 11 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic ConferenceA (90 to 100): 45% (5 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 55% (6 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference45% (5)55% (6)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 11 fully scanned Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility95All education: 91
  2. Botability96All education: 89
  3. Security88All education: 85
  4. Usability70All education: 68
  5. Readability64All education: 56
  • Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference
  • All education
View the data table
Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorGreat Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference averageAll education average
Accessibility9591
Botability9689
Security8885
Usability7068
Readability6456

Top 3 Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites by overall score

#1 in Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 5

Northern Michigan University

A 96 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#2 in Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 6

Wayne State University

A 95 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#3 in Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 8

Michigan Technological University

A 93 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

Most common failures by indicator

The check Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference members by overall score

Great Lakes Intercollegiate Athletic Conference members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 nmu.edu
Northern Michigan University U.S. rank 5
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
2 wayne.edu
Wayne State University U.S. rank 6
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
3 mtu.edu
Michigan Technological University U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
4 ferris.edu
Ferris State University U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
4 uwp.edu
University of Wisconsin-Parkside U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
A
5 pnw.edu
Purdue University Northwest U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
6 gvsu.edu
Grand Valley State University U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
7 lssu.edu
Lake Superior State University U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade F
B
8 davenport.edu
Davenport University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
9 svsu.edu
Saginaw Valley State University U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
10 roosevelt.edu
Roosevelt University U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo