Great Northeast Athletic Conference: website rankings

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 13 Great Northeast Athletic Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 13
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Great Northeast Athletic Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 85

Average overall score of 13 fully scanned Great Northeast Athletic Conference member sites

7th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

13 of 13

Great northeast athletic conference member sites fully scanned

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Great Northeast Athletic Conference overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 13 fully scanned Great Northeast Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 13 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Great Northeast Athletic Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Great Northeast Athletic Conference overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 792
80 to 897
90 to 1004

Great Northeast Athletic Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Great Northeast Athletic Conference: 13 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Great Northeast Athletic ConferenceA (90 to 100): 31% (4 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 69% (9 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Great Northeast Athletic Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Great Northeast Athletic Conference31% (4)69% (9)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

Great Northeast Athletic Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 13 fully scanned Great Northeast Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility90All education: 91
  2. Botability88All education: 89
  3. Security84All education: 85
  4. Usability74All education: 68
  5. Readability45All education: 56
  • Great Northeast Athletic Conference
  • All education
View the data table
Great Northeast Athletic Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorGreat Northeast Athletic Conference averageAll education average
Accessibility9091
Botability8889
Security8485
Usability7468
Readability4556

Top 3 Great Northeast Athletic Conference member sites by overall score

#1 in Great Northeast Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 9

Norwich University

A 92 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#1 in Great Northeast Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 9

Saint Joseph's College of Maine

A 92 overall

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#2 in Great Northeast Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 11

College of Our Lady of the Elms

A 90 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability D
  • Readability -

Most common failures by indicator

The check Great Northeast Athletic Conference member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

Great Northeast Athletic Conference members by overall score

Great Northeast Athletic Conference members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 norwich.edu
Norwich University U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
1 sjcme.edu
Saint Joseph's College of Maine U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
2 elms.edu
College of Our Lady of the Elms U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade -
A
2 rivier.edu
Rivier University U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
3 emmanuel.edu
Emmanuel College U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
3 nec.edu
New England College U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
4 colby-sawyer.edu
Colby-Sawyer College U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
5 mitchell.edu
Mitchell College U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
5 regiscollege.edu
Regis College U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade -
B
6 simmons.edu
Simmons University U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
7 dean.edu
Dean College U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade F
B
8 albertus.edu
Albertus Magnus College U.S. rank 27
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
9 lasell.edu
Lasell University U.S. rank 28
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
C

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo