Utah county websites: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 30 Utah county websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 30
  • Last scan: 11/7/2026

F 46

Average usability score of 28 fully scanned Utah county sites

17th

of 49 states, ranked by average usability score

28 of 30

Sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades

F 48

U.S. county average usability score, 2467 fully scanned sites

Utah's state site, utah.gov, ranks 9th of 51 state sites with a B. State rankings.

How Utah county usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 28 fully scanned Utah county sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 28 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Utah average
  • U.S. county average
View the data table
How Utah county usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 293
30 to 397
40 to 497
50 to 595
60 to 693
70 to 790
80 to 893
90 to 1000

Utah counties by usability grade

Each county with a site on our list is colored by that site's grade. Select a county to open its report. The table lists every site.

Beaver County, UT: grade F, usability score 31 Box Elder County, UT: grade F, usability score 33 Cache County, UT: grade F, usability score 40 Carbon County, UT: grade F, usability score 33 Daggett County, UT: grade F, usability score 43 Davis County, UT: grade F, usability score 40 Duchesne County, UT: grade F, usability score 31 Emery County, UT: grade F, usability score 50 Garfield County, UT: grade F, usability score 50 Grand County, UT: grade F, usability score 33 Iron County, UT: grade F, usability score 56 Juab County, UT: grade B, usability score 87 Kane County, UT: grade F, usability score 50 Millard County, UT: grade F, usability score 21 Morgan County, UT: grade B, usability score 86 Piute County, UT: grade F, usability score 40 Rich County, UT: grade B, usability score 80 Salt Lake County, UT: grade D, usability score 66 San Juan County, UT: grade F, usability score 37 Sanpete County, UT: grade F, usability score 31 Sevier County, UT: grade D, usability score 62 Summit County, UT: grade F, usability score 40 Tooele County, UT: grade D, usability score 62 Uintah County, UT: grade F, usability score 26 Utah County, UT: grade F, usability score 40 Wasatch County, UT: grade F, usability score 26 Washington County, UT: not fully scanned, so not graded (status 403) Wayne County, UT: grade F, usability score 46 Weber County, UT: grade F, usability score 50
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
  • Not fully scanned

1 of the 30 sites on our list could not be matched to a county boundary and appear only in the table.

Utah counties by usability grade, compared with all U.S. counties

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Utah: 28 sites. U.S.: 2467 sites.

  1. UtahB to C (70 to 89): 11% (3 sites)D to F (below 70): 89% (25 sites)
  2. All U.S. countiesA (90 to 100): 2% (39 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 16% (403 sites)D to F (below 70): 82% (2,025 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Utah counties by usability grade, compared with all U.S. counties
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Utah0% (0)11% (3)89% (25)
All U.S. counties2% (39)16% (403)82% (2,025)

Top 3 Utah county sites by usability score

#1 in Utah · U.S. rank 4

Juab County, UT

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#2 in Utah · U.S. rank 5

Morgan County, UT

B 86 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#3 in Utah · U.S. rank 7

Rich County, UT

B 80 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

Most common usability failures among Utah county sites

Share of the 28 fully scanned Utah county sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to its standard and how to fix it.

  1. Open Graph image alt96% (27 of 28 sites)
  2. Open Graph site name93% (26 of 28 sites)
  3. Open Graph description86% (24 of 28 sites)
  4. Open Graph type86% (24 of 28 sites)
  5. Open Graph URL82% (23 of 28 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among Utah county sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt96%27
Open Graph site name93%26
Open Graph description86%24
Open Graph type86%24
Open Graph URL82%23

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
  • Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
  • Open Graph type. The page declares its content type for social media cards. Social media shows wrong content type.
  • Open Graph URL. The page has a canonical URL for social media sharing. Shared links may point to wrong page.

All Utah county sites by usability score

Utah county sites ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 juabcounty.gov
Juab County, UT U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
2 morgancountyutah.gov
Morgan County, UT U.S. rank 5
13 of 15 checks pass B
3 richcounty.gov
Rich County, UT U.S. rank 7
12 of 15 checks pass B
4 saltlakecounty.gov
Salt Lake County, UT U.S. rank 13
10 of 15 checks pass D
5 sevier.utah.gov
Sevier County, UT U.S. rank 15
10 of 16 checks pass D
5 tooeleco.gov
Tooele County, UT U.S. rank 15
10 of 16 checks pass D
6 ironcountyut.gov
Iron County, UT U.S. rank 18
9 of 16 checks pass F
7 emery.utah.gov
Emery County, UT U.S. rank 20
8 of 16 checks pass F
7 garfield.utah.gov
Garfield County, UT U.S. rank 20
8 of 16 checks pass F
7 kane.utah.gov
Kane County, UT U.S. rank 20
8 of 16 checks pass F
7 webercountyutah.gov
Weber County, UT U.S. rank 20
8 of 16 checks pass F
8 waynecountyutah.gov
Wayne County, UT U.S. rank 21
7 of 15 checks pass F
9 daggettcounty.gov
Daggett County, UT U.S. rank 22
7 of 16 checks pass F
10 cachecounty.gov
Cache County, UT U.S. rank 24
6 of 15 checks pass F
10 daviscountyutah.gov
Davis County, UT U.S. rank 24
6 of 15 checks pass F
10 piute.gov
Piute County, UT U.S. rank 24
6 of 15 checks pass F
10 summitcountyutah.gov
Summit County, UT U.S. rank 24
6 of 15 checks pass F
10 utahcounty.gov
Utah County, UT U.S. rank 24
6 of 15 checks pass F
11 sanjuancountyut.gov
San Juan County, UT U.S. rank 25
6 of 16 checks pass F
12 boxeldercountyut.gov
Box Elder County, UT U.S. rank 27
5 of 15 checks pass F
12 carbon.utah.gov
Carbon County, UT U.S. rank 27
5 of 15 checks pass F
12 grandcountyutah.net
Grand County, UT U.S. rank 27
5 of 15 checks pass F
13 beaver.utah.gov
Beaver County, UT U.S. rank 28
5 of 16 checks pass F
13 duchesne.utah.gov
Duchesne County, UT U.S. rank 28
5 of 16 checks pass F
13 sanpetecountyutah.gov
Sanpete County, UT U.S. rank 28
5 of 16 checks pass F
14 uintah.gov
Uintah County, UT U.S. rank 30
4 of 15 checks pass F
14 wasatchcounty.gov
Wasatch County, UT U.S. rank 30
4 of 15 checks pass F
15 millardcounty.gov
Millard County, UT U.S. rank 32
3 of 14 checks pass F
washco.utah.gov
Washington County, UT
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 -
waynecountyutah.org
Wayne County, UT
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because its security certificate didn't pass validation. Status 993 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each county site on our county list in Utah. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/4/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo