Utah county websites: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 29 Utah county government websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 29
  • Last scan: 9/20/2026

F 51

Average usability score of 27 fully scanned Utah county sites

11th

of 48 states, ranked by average usability score

27 of 29

Sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades

F 49

U.S. county average usability score, 2435 fully scanned sites

Utah's state site, utah.gov, ranks 8th of 51 state sites with a B. State rankings.

How Utah county usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 27 fully scanned Utah county sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 27 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Utah average
  • U.S. county average
View the data table
How Utah county usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 291
30 to 395
40 to 4910
50 to 595
60 to 692
70 to 791
80 to 893
90 to 1000

Utah counties by usability grade

Each county with a site on our list is colored by that site's grade. Select a county to open its report. The table lists every site.

Beaver County, UT: grade F, usability score 35 Box Elder County, UT: grade F, usability score 35 Cache County, UT: grade F, usability score 41 Carbon County, UT: grade B, usability score 81 Daggett County, UT: grade F, usability score 47 Davis County, UT: not fully scanned, so not graded (status 995) Duchesne County, UT: grade F, usability score 41 Emery County, UT: grade F, usability score 47 Garfield County, UT: grade F, usability score 52 Grand County, UT: grade F, usability score 35 Iron County, UT: grade F, usability score 58 Juab County, UT: grade B, usability score 88 Kane County, UT: grade F, usability score 47 Millard County, UT: grade F, usability score 43 Morgan County, UT: grade B, usability score 87 Piute County, UT: grade F, usability score 47 Rich County, UT: grade C, usability score 76 Salt Lake County, UT: grade D, usability score 64 San Juan County, UT: grade F, usability score 41 Sanpete County, UT: grade F, usability score 52 Sevier County, UT: grade F, usability score 52 Summit County, UT: grade F, usability score 35 Tooele County, UT: grade D, usability score 64 Uintah County, UT: grade F, usability score 47 Utah County, UT: grade F, usability score 41 Wasatch County, UT: grade F, usability score 29 Washington County, UT: not fully scanned, so not graded (status 995) Wayne County, UT: grade F, usability score 37 Weber County, UT: grade F, usability score 52
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
  • Not fully scanned

Utah counties by usability grade, compared with all U.S. counties

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Utah: 27 sites. U.S.: 2435 sites.

  1. UtahB to C (70 to 89): 15% (4 sites)D to F (below 70): 85% (23 sites)
  2. All U.S. countiesA (90 to 100): 1% (24 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 18% (436 sites)D to F (below 70): 81% (1,975 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Utah counties by usability grade, compared with all U.S. counties
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Utah0% (0)15% (4)85% (23)
All U.S. counties1% (24)18% (436)81% (1,975)

Top 3 Utah county sites by usability score

#1 in Utah · U.S. rank 4

Juab County, UT

B 88 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security A
  • Usability B

#2 in Utah · U.S. rank 5

Morgan County, UT

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B

#3 in Utah · U.S. rank 7

Carbon County, UT

B 81 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security B
  • Usability B

Most common usability failures among Utah county sites

Share of the 27 fully scanned Utah county sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to its standard and how to fix it.

  1. Open Graph image alt96% (26 of 27 sites)
  2. Open Graph site name89% (24 of 27 sites)
  3. Open Graph description81% (22 of 27 sites)
  4. Open Graph type81% (22 of 27 sites)
  5. Open Graph URL78% (21 of 27 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among Utah county sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt96%26
Open Graph site name89%24
Open Graph description81%22
Open Graph type81%22
Open Graph URL78%21

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
  • Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.
  • Open Graph type. The page declares its content type for social media cards. Social media shows wrong content type.
  • Open Graph URL. The page has a canonical URL for social media sharing. Shared links may point to wrong page.

All Utah county sites by usability score

Utah county sites ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 juabcounty.gov
Juab County, UT U.S. rank 4
15 of 17 checks pass B
2 morgancountyutah.gov
Morgan County, UT U.S. rank 5
14 of 16 checks pass B
3 carbon.utah.gov
Carbon County, UT U.S. rank 7
13 of 16 checks pass B
4 richcounty.gov
Rich County, UT U.S. rank 8
13 of 17 checks pass C
5 saltlakecounty.gov
Salt Lake County, UT U.S. rank 12
11 of 17 checks pass D
5 tooeleco.gov
Tooele County, UT U.S. rank 12
11 of 17 checks pass D
6 ironcountyut.gov
Iron County, UT U.S. rank 14
10 of 17 checks pass F
7 garfield.utah.gov
Garfield County, UT U.S. rank 16
9 of 17 checks pass F
7 sanpetecountyutah.gov
Sanpete County, UT U.S. rank 16
9 of 17 checks pass F
7 sevier.utah.gov
Sevier County, UT U.S. rank 16
9 of 17 checks pass F
7 webercountyutah.gov
Weber County, UT U.S. rank 16
9 of 17 checks pass F
8 daggettcounty.gov
Daggett County, UT U.S. rank 18
8 of 17 checks pass F
8 emery.utah.gov
Emery County, UT U.S. rank 18
8 of 17 checks pass F
8 kane.utah.gov
Kane County, UT U.S. rank 18
8 of 17 checks pass F
8 piute.gov
Piute County, UT U.S. rank 18
8 of 17 checks pass F
8 uintah.gov
Uintah County, UT U.S. rank 18
8 of 17 checks pass F
9 millardcounty.gov
Millard County, UT U.S. rank 19
7 of 16 checks pass F
10 cachecounty.gov
Cache County, UT U.S. rank 20
7 of 17 checks pass F
10 duchesne.utah.gov
Duchesne County, UT U.S. rank 20
7 of 17 checks pass F
10 sanjuancountyut.gov
San Juan County, UT U.S. rank 20
7 of 17 checks pass F
10 utahcounty.gov
Utah County, UT U.S. rank 20
7 of 17 checks pass F
11 waynecountyutah.gov
Wayne County, UT U.S. rank 21
6 of 16 checks pass F
12 beaver.utah.gov
Beaver County, UT U.S. rank 22
6 of 17 checks pass F
12 boxeldercountyut.gov
Box Elder County, UT U.S. rank 22
6 of 17 checks pass F
12 grandcountyutah.net
Grand County, UT U.S. rank 22
6 of 17 checks pass F
12 summitcountyutah.gov
Summit County, UT U.S. rank 22
6 of 17 checks pass F
13 wasatchcounty.gov
Wasatch County, UT U.S. rank 24
5 of 17 checks pass F
daviscountyutah.gov
Davis County, UT
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -
washco.utah.gov
Washington County, UT
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each county government site on our county list in Utah. Scores come from the checks listed on standards.scangov.org. Sites were scanned between 8/24/2026 and 9/17/2026; each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage returned successfully and sent the scanner its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We weren't able to fully scan 2 sites because they did not respond, blocked the scanner, or returned no page content. They appear in the table without grades, each with its scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale, and rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, including every county's raw results, is published in the ScanGov data repository.