Showing Utah county sites. All U.S. county sites
B 89
Average security score of 28 fully scanned Utah county sites
5th
of 49 states, ranked by average security score
28 of 30
Sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades
B 83
U.S. county average security score, 2467 fully scanned sites
Utah's state site, utah.gov, ranks 9th of 51 state sites with a B. State rankings.
How Utah county security scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 28 fully scanned Utah county sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 28 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Utah average
- U.S. county average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 4 |
| 80 to 89 | 15 |
| 90 to 100 | 9 |
Utah counties by security grade
Each county with a site on our list is colored by that site's grade. Select a county to open its report. The table lists every site.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
- Not fully scanned
1 of the 30 sites on our list could not be matched to a county boundary and appear only in the table.
Utah counties by security grade, compared with all U.S. counties
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Utah: 28 sites. U.S.: 2467 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utah | 32% (9) | 68% (19) | 0% (0) |
| All U.S. counties | 21% (530) | 67% (1,642) | 12% (295) |
Top 3 Utah county sites by security score
#1 in Utah · U.S. rank 1
Beaver County, UT
A 100 security
- Accessibility B
- Botability B
- Security A
- Usability F
- Readability A
#1 in Utah · U.S. rank 1
Daggett County, UT
A 100 security
- Accessibility B
- Botability B
- Security A
- Usability F
- Readability A
#1 in Utah · U.S. rank 1
Davis County, UT
A 100 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability B
- Security A
- Usability F
- Readability A
What each check means
- X-Content-Type-Options. The site tells browsers not to guess the type of files it serves. Browsers might run dangerous files by mistake.
- Errors in the console. The page loads without JavaScript or network errors. Site may have hidden bugs that break features.
- Sponsored top-level domain (sTLD). The site uses a government-issued domain (.gov, .edu, or .mil). People cannot tell if your site is real government.
All Utah county sites by security score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
beaver.utah.gov
Beaver County, UT U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
daggettcounty.gov
Daggett County, UT U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
daviscountyutah.gov
Davis County, UT U.S. rank 1 |
7 of 7 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
kane.utah.gov
Kane County, UT U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
sanjuancountyut.gov
San Juan County, UT U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
sanpetecountyutah.gov
Sanpete County, UT U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
summitcountyutah.gov
Summit County, UT U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
uintah.gov
Uintah County, UT U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
wasatchcounty.gov
Wasatch County, UT U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
boxeldercountyut.gov
Box Elder County, UT U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
cachecounty.gov
Cache County, UT U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
carbon.utah.gov
Carbon County, UT U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
emery.utah.gov
Emery County, UT U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
garfield.utah.gov
Garfield County, UT U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
grandcountyutah.net
Grand County, UT U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
ironcountyut.gov
Iron County, UT U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
juabcounty.gov
Juab County, UT U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
millardcounty.gov
Millard County, UT U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
morgancountyutah.gov
Morgan County, UT U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
piute.gov
Piute County, UT U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
richcounty.gov
Rich County, UT U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
saltlakecounty.gov
Salt Lake County, UT U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
utahcounty.gov
Utah County, UT U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
waynecountyutah.gov
Wayne County, UT U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
duchesne.utah.gov
Duchesne County, UT U.S. rank 6 |
6 of 8 checks pass | C |
| 3 |
sevier.utah.gov
Sevier County, UT U.S. rank 6 |
6 of 8 checks pass | C |
| 3 |
tooeleco.gov
Tooele County, UT U.S. rank 6 |
6 of 8 checks pass | C |
| 3 |
webercountyutah.gov
Weber County, UT U.S. rank 6 |
6 of 8 checks pass | C |
|
washco.utah.gov
Washington County, UT |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 | - | |
|
waynecountyutah.org
Wayne County, UT |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because its security certificate didn't pass validation. Status 993 | - |
About security
Secure your site and protect users with proper security practices.
Why it's important
Strong defenses prevent hackers from stealing personal information and other confidential data.
Risks
- Hackers can steal private information from your site.
Guidance
What we use to grade security:
- CISA Website Security
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- CISA Cybersecurity Performance Goals
- RFC 9116
- OWASP Top 10
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
Standards
- Content security policy (CSP)
- HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)
- security.txt
- X-Content-Type-Options
- Errors in the console
- Clickjacking mitigation
- Paste preventing inputs
- Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure (HTTPS)
- Sponsored top-level domain (sTLD)
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each county site on our county list in Utah. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/4/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.