Utah county websites: botability rankings

Botability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 30 Utah county websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 30
  • Last scan: 11/7/2026

B 81

Average botability score of 28 fully scanned Utah county sites

4th

of 49 states, ranked by average botability score

28 of 30

Sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades

C 76

U.S. county average botability score, 2467 fully scanned sites

Utah's state site, utah.gov, ranks 9th of 51 state sites with a B. State rankings.

How Utah county botability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 28 fully scanned Utah county sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 28 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Utah average
  • U.S. county average
View the data table
How Utah county botability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 592
60 to 692
70 to 790
80 to 8918
90 to 1006

Utah counties by botability grade

Each county with a site on our list is colored by that site's grade. Select a county to open its report. The table lists every site.

Beaver County, UT: grade B, botability score 81 Box Elder County, UT: grade B, botability score 81 Cache County, UT: grade A, botability score 90 Carbon County, UT: grade B, botability score 81 Daggett County, UT: grade B, botability score 81 Davis County, UT: grade B, botability score 83 Duchesne County, UT: grade B, botability score 81 Emery County, UT: grade A, botability score 90 Garfield County, UT: grade A, botability score 90 Grand County, UT: grade B, botability score 81 Iron County, UT: grade B, botability score 88 Juab County, UT: grade B, botability score 81 Kane County, UT: grade B, botability score 81 Millard County, UT: grade B, botability score 88 Morgan County, UT: grade A, botability score 90 Piute County, UT: grade A, botability score 90 Rich County, UT: grade A, botability score 90 Salt Lake County, UT: grade D, botability score 66 San Juan County, UT: grade B, botability score 81 Sanpete County, UT: grade B, botability score 81 Sevier County, UT: grade F, botability score 55 Summit County, UT: grade B, botability score 81 Tooele County, UT: grade D, botability score 66 Uintah County, UT: grade B, botability score 81 Utah County, UT: grade B, botability score 81 Wasatch County, UT: grade B, botability score 81 Washington County, UT: not fully scanned, so not graded (status 403) Wayne County, UT: grade B, botability score 81 Weber County, UT: grade F, botability score 54
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
  • Not fully scanned

1 of the 30 sites on our list could not be matched to a county boundary and appear only in the table.

Utah counties by botability grade, compared with all U.S. counties

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Utah: 28 sites. U.S.: 2467 sites.

  1. UtahA (90 to 100): 21% (6 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 64% (18 sites)D to F (below 70): 14% (4 sites)
  2. All U.S. countiesA (90 to 100): 18% (445 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 48% (1,184 sites)D to F (below 70): 34% (838 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Utah counties by botability grade, compared with all U.S. counties
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Utah21% (6)64% (18)14% (4)
All U.S. counties18% (445)48% (1,184)34% (838)

Top 3 Utah county sites by botability score

#1 in Utah · U.S. rank 2

Cache County, UT

A 90 botability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability F
  • Readability F

#1 in Utah · U.S. rank 2

Emery County, UT

A 90 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability F
  • Readability F

#1 in Utah · U.S. rank 2

Garfield County, UT

A 90 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability F
  • Readability F

Most common botability failures among Utah county sites

Share of the 28 fully scanned Utah county sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to its standard and how to fix it.

  1. GovernmentOrganization Schema.org type96% (27 of 28 sites)
  2. Robots valid36% (10 of 28 sites)
  3. Link text18% (5 of 28 sites)
  4. Sitemap status14% (4 of 28 sites)
  5. Sitemap XML14% (4 of 28 sites)
View the data table
Most common botability failures among Utah county sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
GovernmentOrganization Schema.org type96%27
Robots valid36%10
Link text18%5
Sitemap status14%4
Sitemap XML14%4

What each check means

  • GovernmentOrganization Schema.org type. Homepage is marked up as an official government organization. Systems cannot verify you are an official government site.
  • Robots valid. The site's robots.txt file is written correctly so search engines can follow it. Search engines ignore crawling rules they cannot read.
  • Link text. Links use descriptive text that tells users and search engines where they go. Users cannot tell where links go.
  • Sitemap status. The sitemap file loads and returns a successful response. Search engines cannot find all your pages.
  • Sitemap XML. The sitemap file uses the required XML format. Search engines cannot read your sitemap.

All Utah county sites by botability score

Utah county sites ranked by botability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 cachecounty.gov
Cache County, UT U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
1 emery.utah.gov
Emery County, UT U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
1 garfield.utah.gov
Garfield County, UT U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
1 morgancountyutah.gov
Morgan County, UT U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
1 piute.gov
Piute County, UT U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
1 richcounty.gov
Rich County, UT U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 ironcountyut.gov
Iron County, UT U.S. rank 3
8 of 9 checks pass B
2 millardcounty.gov
Millard County, UT U.S. rank 3
8 of 9 checks pass B
3 daviscountyutah.gov
Davis County, UT U.S. rank 6
5 of 6 checks pass B
4 beaver.utah.gov
Beaver County, UT U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
4 boxeldercountyut.gov
Box Elder County, UT U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
4 carbon.utah.gov
Carbon County, UT U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
4 daggettcounty.gov
Daggett County, UT U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
4 duchesne.utah.gov
Duchesne County, UT U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
4 grandcountyutah.net
Grand County, UT U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
4 juabcounty.gov
Juab County, UT U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
4 kane.utah.gov
Kane County, UT U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
4 sanjuancountyut.gov
San Juan County, UT U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
4 sanpetecountyutah.gov
Sanpete County, UT U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
4 summitcountyutah.gov
Summit County, UT U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
4 uintah.gov
Uintah County, UT U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
4 utahcounty.gov
Utah County, UT U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
4 wasatchcounty.gov
Wasatch County, UT U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
4 waynecountyutah.gov
Wayne County, UT U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
5 saltlakecounty.gov
Salt Lake County, UT U.S. rank 13
6 of 9 checks pass D
5 tooeleco.gov
Tooele County, UT U.S. rank 13
6 of 9 checks pass D
6 sevier.utah.gov
Sevier County, UT U.S. rank 17
5 of 9 checks pass F
7 webercountyutah.gov
Weber County, UT U.S. rank 18
6 of 11 checks pass F
washco.utah.gov
Washington County, UT
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 -
waynecountyutah.org
Wayne County, UT
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because its security certificate didn't pass validation. Status 993 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each county site on our county list in Utah. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/4/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo