Utah county websites: botability rankings

Botability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 29 Utah county government websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 29
  • Last scan: 9/20/2026

C 76

Average botability score of 27 fully scanned Utah county sites

9th

of 48 states, ranked by average botability score

27 of 29

Sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades

C 76

U.S. county average botability score, 2435 fully scanned sites

Utah's state site, utah.gov, ranks 8th of 51 state sites with a B. State rankings.

How Utah county botability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 27 fully scanned Utah county sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 27 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Utah average
  • U.S. county average
View the data table
How Utah county botability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 591
60 to 699
70 to 792
80 to 899
90 to 1006

Utah counties by botability grade

Each county with a site on our list is colored by that site's grade. Select a county to open its report. The table lists every site.

Beaver County, UT: grade D, botability score 63 Box Elder County, UT: grade D, botability score 63 Cache County, UT: grade A, botability score 90 Carbon County, UT: grade B, botability score 81 Daggett County, UT: grade D, botability score 63 Davis County, UT: not fully scanned, so not graded (status 995) Duchesne County, UT: grade B, botability score 81 Emery County, UT: grade C, botability score 72 Garfield County, UT: grade A, botability score 90 Grand County, UT: grade D, botability score 63 Iron County, UT: grade A, botability score 90 Juab County, UT: grade B, botability score 81 Kane County, UT: grade D, botability score 63 Millard County, UT: grade C, botability score 72 Morgan County, UT: grade A, botability score 90 Piute County, UT: grade A, botability score 90 Rich County, UT: grade A, botability score 90 Salt Lake County, UT: grade B, botability score 87 San Juan County, UT: grade D, botability score 63 Sanpete County, UT: grade D, botability score 63 Sevier County, UT: grade B, botability score 87 Summit County, UT: grade D, botability score 63 Tooele County, UT: grade B, botability score 87 Uintah County, UT: grade B, botability score 87 Utah County, UT: grade B, botability score 81 Wasatch County, UT: grade D, botability score 63 Washington County, UT: not fully scanned, so not graded (status 995) Wayne County, UT: grade B, botability score 81 Weber County, UT: grade F, botability score 54
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
  • Not fully scanned

Utah counties by botability grade, compared with all U.S. counties

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Utah: 27 sites. U.S.: 2435 sites.

  1. UtahA (90 to 100): 22% (6 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 41% (11 sites)D to F (below 70): 37% (10 sites)
  2. All U.S. countiesA (90 to 100): 20% (488 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 47% (1,135 sites)D to F (below 70): 33% (812 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Utah counties by botability grade, compared with all U.S. counties
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Utah22% (6)41% (11)37% (10)
All U.S. counties20% (488)47% (1,135)33% (812)

Top 3 Utah county sites by botability score

#1 in Utah · U.S. rank 2

Cache County, UT

A 90 botability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability F

#1 in Utah · U.S. rank 2

Garfield County, UT

A 90 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability F

#1 in Utah · U.S. rank 2

Iron County, UT

A 90 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability F

Most common botability failures among Utah county sites

Share of the 27 fully scanned Utah county sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to its standard and how to fix it.

  1. GovernmentOrganization Schema.org type100% (27 of 27 sites)
  2. Sitemap status44% (12 of 27 sites)
  3. Sitemap XML44% (12 of 27 sites)
  4. Robots valid33% (9 of 27 sites)
  5. Sitemap in robots.txt15% (4 of 27 sites)
View the data table
Most common botability failures among Utah county sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
GovernmentOrganization Schema.org type100%27
Sitemap status44%12
Sitemap XML44%12
Robots valid33%9
Sitemap in robots.txt15%4

What each check means

  • GovernmentOrganization Schema.org type. Homepage is marked up as an official government organization. Systems cannot verify you are an official government site.
  • Sitemap status. The sitemap file loads and returns a successful response. Search engines cannot find all your pages.
  • Sitemap XML. The sitemap file uses the required XML format. Search engines cannot read your sitemap.
  • Robots valid. The site has a robots.txt file that guides search engines. Search engines ignore your instructions.
  • Sitemap in robots.txt. The robots.txt file links to the sitemap. Search engines take longer to find your pages.

All Utah county sites by botability score

Utah county sites ranked by botability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 cachecounty.gov
Cache County, UT U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
1 garfield.utah.gov
Garfield County, UT U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
1 ironcountyut.gov
Iron County, UT U.S. rank 2
9 of 10 checks pass A
1 morgancountyutah.gov
Morgan County, UT U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
1 piute.gov
Piute County, UT U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
1 richcounty.gov
Rich County, UT U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 saltlakecounty.gov
Salt Lake County, UT U.S. rank 3
7 of 8 checks pass B
2 sevier.utah.gov
Sevier County, UT U.S. rank 3
7 of 8 checks pass B
2 tooeleco.gov
Tooele County, UT U.S. rank 3
7 of 8 checks pass B
2 uintah.gov
Uintah County, UT U.S. rank 3
7 of 8 checks pass B
3 carbon.utah.gov
Carbon County, UT U.S. rank 4
9 of 11 checks pass B
3 duchesne.utah.gov
Duchesne County, UT U.S. rank 4
9 of 11 checks pass B
3 juabcounty.gov
Juab County, UT U.S. rank 4
9 of 11 checks pass B
3 utahcounty.gov
Utah County, UT U.S. rank 4
9 of 11 checks pass B
3 waynecountyutah.gov
Wayne County, UT U.S. rank 4
9 of 11 checks pass B
4 emery.utah.gov
Emery County, UT U.S. rank 7
8 of 11 checks pass C
4 millardcounty.gov
Millard County, UT U.S. rank 7
8 of 11 checks pass C
5 beaver.utah.gov
Beaver County, UT U.S. rank 9
7 of 11 checks pass D
5 boxeldercountyut.gov
Box Elder County, UT U.S. rank 9
7 of 11 checks pass D
5 daggettcounty.gov
Daggett County, UT U.S. rank 9
7 of 11 checks pass D
5 grandcountyutah.net
Grand County, UT U.S. rank 9
7 of 11 checks pass D
5 kane.utah.gov
Kane County, UT U.S. rank 9
7 of 11 checks pass D
5 sanjuancountyut.gov
San Juan County, UT U.S. rank 9
7 of 11 checks pass D
5 sanpetecountyutah.gov
Sanpete County, UT U.S. rank 9
7 of 11 checks pass D
5 summitcountyutah.gov
Summit County, UT U.S. rank 9
7 of 11 checks pass D
5 wasatchcounty.gov
Wasatch County, UT U.S. rank 9
7 of 11 checks pass D
6 webercountyutah.gov
Weber County, UT U.S. rank 11
6 of 11 checks pass F
daviscountyutah.gov
Davis County, UT
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -
washco.utah.gov
Washington County, UT
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each county government site on our county list in Utah. Scores come from the checks listed on standards.scangov.org. Sites were scanned between 8/24/2026 and 9/17/2026; each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage returned successfully and sent the scanner its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We weren't able to fully scan 2 sites because they did not respond, blocked the scanner, or returned no page content. They appear in the table without grades, each with its scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale, and rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, including every county's raw results, is published in the ScanGov data repository.