Utah county websites ranked by digital experience

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 30 Utah county websites across accessibility, botability, security, usability, and readability.

  • Sites: 30
  • Last scan: 11/7/2026

C 79

Average overall score of 28 fully scanned Utah county sites

4th

of 49 states, ranked by average overall score

28 of 30

Sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 2, so they're listed without grades

C 76

U.S. county average overall score, 2467 fully scanned sites

Utah's state site, utah.gov, ranks 9th of 51 state sites with a B. State rankings.

How Utah county overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 28 fully scanned Utah county sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 28 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Utah average
  • U.S. county average
View the data table
How Utah county overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 7916
80 to 8910
90 to 1002

Utah counties by overall grade

Each county with a site on our list is colored by that site's grade. Select a county to open its report. The table lists every site.

Beaver County, UT: grade C, overall score 76 Box Elder County, UT: grade C, overall score 79 Cache County, UT: grade C, overall score 72 Carbon County, UT: grade C, overall score 73 Daggett County, UT: grade C, overall score 77 Davis County, UT: grade B, overall score 80 Duchesne County, UT: grade C, overall score 71 Emery County, UT: grade B, overall score 83 Garfield County, UT: grade B, overall score 84 Grand County, UT: grade C, overall score 76 Iron County, UT: grade B, overall score 86 Juab County, UT: grade A, overall score 92 Kane County, UT: grade B, overall score 81 Millard County, UT: grade C, overall score 75 Morgan County, UT: grade A, overall score 90 Piute County, UT: grade C, overall score 75 Rich County, UT: grade B, overall score 89 Salt Lake County, UT: grade B, overall score 84 San Juan County, UT: grade C, overall score 76 Sanpete County, UT: grade C, overall score 78 Sevier County, UT: grade B, overall score 81 Summit County, UT: grade B, overall score 80 Tooele County, UT: grade C, overall score 79 Uintah County, UT: grade C, overall score 76 Utah County, UT: grade B, overall score 80 Wasatch County, UT: grade C, overall score 73 Washington County, UT: not fully scanned, so not graded (status 403) Wayne County, UT: grade C, overall score 79 Weber County, UT: grade C, overall score 74
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
  • Not fully scanned

1 of the 30 sites on our list could not be matched to a county boundary and appear only in the table.

Utah counties by overall grade, compared with all U.S. counties

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Utah: 28 sites. U.S.: 2467 sites.

  1. UtahA (90 to 100): 7% (2 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 93% (26 sites)
  2. All U.S. countiesA (90 to 100): 4% (90 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 82% (2,028 sites)D to F (below 70): 14% (349 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Utah counties by overall grade, compared with all U.S. counties
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Utah7% (2)93% (26)0% (0)
All U.S. counties4% (90)82% (2,028)14% (349)

Utah county average score by indicator, compared with all U.S. counties

Average of the 28 fully scanned Utah county sites, score 0 to 100. U.S. average covers 2467 fully scanned county sites.

  1. Accessibility92U.S. counties: 88
  2. Botability81U.S. counties: 76
  3. Security89U.S. counties: 83
  4. Usability46U.S. counties: 48
  5. Readability70U.S. counties: 62
  • Utah
  • U.S. counties
View the data table
Utah county average score by indicator, compared with all U.S. counties
IndicatorUtah averageU.S. counties average
Accessibility9288
Botability8176
Security8983
Usability4648
Readability7062

Top 3 Utah county sites by overall score

#1 in Utah · U.S. rank 5

Juab County, UT

A 92 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability B
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#2 in Utah · U.S. rank 7

Morgan County, UT

A 90 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#3 in Utah · U.S. rank 8

Rich County, UT

B 89 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

Most common failures by indicator

The check Utah county sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

All Utah county sites by overall score

Utah county sites ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 juabcounty.gov
Juab County, UT U.S. rank 5
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
2 morgancountyutah.gov
Morgan County, UT U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
3 richcounty.gov
Rich County, UT U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
4 ironcountyut.gov
Iron County, UT U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
5 garfield.utah.gov
Garfield County, UT U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
5 saltlakecounty.gov
Salt Lake County, UT U.S. rank 13
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
6 emery.utah.gov
Emery County, UT U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
7 kane.utah.gov
Kane County, UT U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
7 sevier.utah.gov
Sevier County, UT U.S. rank 16
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade F
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade -
B
8 daviscountyutah.gov
Davis County, UT U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
8 summitcountyutah.gov
Summit County, UT U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
8 utahcounty.gov
Utah County, UT U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
9 boxeldercountyut.gov
Box Elder County, UT U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
9 tooeleco.gov
Tooele County, UT U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
C
9 waynecountyutah.gov
Wayne County, UT U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
10 sanpetecountyutah.gov
Sanpete County, UT U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
11 daggettcounty.gov
Daggett County, UT U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
12 beaver.utah.gov
Beaver County, UT U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
12 grandcountyutah.net
Grand County, UT U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
12 sanjuancountyut.gov
San Juan County, UT U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
12 uintah.gov
Uintah County, UT U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
13 millardcounty.gov
Millard County, UT U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
13 piute.gov
Piute County, UT U.S. rank 22
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
14 webercountyutah.gov
Weber County, UT U.S. rank 23
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade F
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
15 carbon.utah.gov
Carbon County, UT U.S. rank 24
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
15 wasatchcounty.gov
Wasatch County, UT U.S. rank 24
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
16 cachecounty.gov
Cache County, UT U.S. rank 25
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
17 duchesne.utah.gov
Duchesne County, UT U.S. rank 26
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
C
washco.utah.gov
Washington County, UT
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 -
waynecountyutah.org
Wayne County, UT
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because its security certificate didn't pass validation. Status 993 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each county site on our county list in Utah. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/4/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 2 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo