Showing Arizona county sites. All U.S. county sites
F 48
Average usability score of 10 fully scanned Arizona county sites
14th
of 48 states, ranked by average usability score
10 of 14
Sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 4, so they're listed without grades
F 49
U.S. county average usability score, 2435 fully scanned sites
Arizona's state site, az.gov, could not be fully scanned. State rankings.
How Arizona county usability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 10 fully scanned Arizona county sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 10 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Arizona average
- U.S. county average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 3 |
| 30 to 39 | 2 |
| 40 to 49 | 1 |
| 50 to 59 | 1 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 3 |
| 80 to 89 | 0 |
| 90 to 100 | 0 |
Arizona counties by usability grade
Each county with a site on our list is colored by that site's grade. Select a county to open its report. The table lists every site.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
- Not fully scanned
- No site on our list
Arizona counties by usability grade, compared with all U.S. counties
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Arizona: 10 sites. U.S.: 2435 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona | 0% (0) | 30% (3) | 70% (7) |
| All U.S. counties | 1% (24) | 18% (436) | 81% (1,975) |
Top 3 Arizona county sites by usability score
#1 in Arizona · U.S. rank 8
Pima County, AZ
C 76 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability B
- Security C
- Usability C
#1 in Arizona · U.S. rank 8
Yavapai County, AZ
C 76 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability C
#2 in Arizona · U.S. rank 10
Mohave County, AZ
C 70 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability C
What each check means
- First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
- Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
- Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
- Open Graph type. The page declares its content type for social media cards. Social media shows wrong content type.
All Arizona county sites by usability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
pima.gov
Pima County, AZ U.S. rank 8 |
13 of 17 checks pass | C |
| 1 |
yavapaiaz.gov
Yavapai County, AZ U.S. rank 8 |
13 of 17 checks pass | C |
| 2 |
mohave.gov
Mohave County, AZ U.S. rank 10 |
12 of 17 checks pass | C |
| 3 |
gilacountyaz.gov
Gila County, AZ U.S. rank 14 |
10 of 17 checks pass | F |
| 4 |
navajocountyaz.gov
Navajo County, AZ U.S. rank 20 |
7 of 17 checks pass | F |
| 5 |
cochise.az.gov
Cochise County, AZ U.S. rank 22 |
6 of 17 checks pass | F |
| 5 |
coconino.az.gov
Coconino County, AZ U.S. rank 22 |
6 of 17 checks pass | F |
| 6 |
greenlee.az.gov
Greenlee County, AZ U.S. rank 24 |
5 of 17 checks pass | F |
| 6 |
lapaz.gov
La Paz County, AZ U.S. rank 24 |
5 of 17 checks pass | F |
| 6 |
maricopa.gov
Maricopa County, AZ U.S. rank 24 |
5 of 17 checks pass | F |
|
apachecountyaz.gov
Apache County, AZ |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 | - | |
|
graham.az.gov
Graham County, AZ |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
pinal.gov
Pinal County, AZ |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
santacruzcountyaz.gov
Santa Cruz County, AZ |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - |
About usability
Optimize content structure so users quickly find what they need.
Why it's important
Well-written pages help people understand laws, services, and procedures without confusion, reducing calls and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your information.
Guidance
What we use to grade usability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Automated Readability Index (ARI)
- Flesch-Kincaid (FK)
- Plain Writing Act of 2010
- Google Search Central
- Web Vitals / Core Web Vitals
- Open Graph
Standards
- Page title
- Page description
- Readability
- Viewport meta tag
- www resolution
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
- First Contentful Paint (FCP)
- Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- Time to First Byte (TTFB)
- Open Graph site name
- Open Graph type
- Open Graph title
- Open Graph description
- Open Graph URL
- Open Graph image
- Open Graph image alt
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each county government site on our county list in Arizona. Scores come from the checks listed on standards.scangov.org. Sites were scanned between 8/18/2026 and 9/17/2026; each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage returned successfully and sent the scanner its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We weren't able to fully scan 4 sites because they did not respond, blocked the scanner, or returned no page content. They appear in the table without grades, each with its scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale, and rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, including every county's raw results, is published in the ScanGov data repository.