Showing Arizona county sites. All U.S. county sites
A 90
Average security score of 10 fully scanned Arizona county sites
7th
of 48 states, ranked by average security score
10 of 14
Sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 4, so they're listed without grades
B 88
U.S. county average security score, 2435 fully scanned sites
Arizona's state site, az.gov, could not be fully scanned. State rankings.
How Arizona county security scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 10 fully scanned Arizona county sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 10 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Arizona average
- U.S. county average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 1 |
| 80 to 89 | 6 |
| 90 to 100 | 3 |
Arizona counties by security grade
Each county with a site on our list is colored by that site's grade. Select a county to open its report. The table lists every site.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
- Not fully scanned
- No site on our list
Arizona counties by security grade, compared with all U.S. counties
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Arizona: 10 sites. U.S.: 2435 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona | 30% (3) | 70% (7) | 0% (0) |
| All U.S. counties | 34% (823) | 65% (1,574) | 2% (38) |
Top 3 Arizona county sites by security score
#1 in Arizona · U.S. rank 1
La Paz County, AZ
A 100 security
- Accessibility B
- Botability D
- Security A
- Usability F
#1 in Arizona · U.S. rank 1
Mohave County, AZ
A 100 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability C
#1 in Arizona · U.S. rank 1
Yavapai County, AZ
A 100 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability C
What each check means
- Errors in the console. The page loads without JavaScript or network errors. Site may have hidden bugs that break features.
- Security.txt. The site has a security.txt file so researchers know how to report issues. Security researchers cannot report problems to you.
All Arizona county sites by security score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
lapaz.gov
La Paz County, AZ U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
mohave.gov
Mohave County, AZ U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
yavapaiaz.gov
Yavapai County, AZ U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
cochise.az.gov
Cochise County, AZ U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
coconino.az.gov
Coconino County, AZ U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
maricopa.gov
Maricopa County, AZ U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
navajocountyaz.gov
Navajo County, AZ U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
gilacountyaz.gov
Gila County, AZ U.S. rank 4 |
6 of 7 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
greenlee.az.gov
Greenlee County, AZ U.S. rank 4 |
6 of 7 checks pass | B |
| 4 |
pima.gov
Pima County, AZ U.S. rank 6 |
7 of 9 checks pass | C |
|
apachecountyaz.gov
Apache County, AZ |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 403 | - | |
|
graham.az.gov
Graham County, AZ |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
pinal.gov
Pinal County, AZ |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - | |
|
santacruzcountyaz.gov
Santa Cruz County, AZ |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 | - |
About security
Secure your site and protect users with proper security practices.
Why it's important
Strong defenses prevent hackers from stealing personal information and other confidential data.
Risks
- Hackers can steal private information from your site.
Guidance
What we use to grade security:
- CISA Website Security
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- CISA Cybersecurity Performance Goals
- RFC 9116
- OWASP Top 10
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
Standards
- Content security policy (CSP)
- HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)
- security.txt
- X-Content-Type-Options
- Errors in the console
- Clickjacking mitigation
- Paste preventing inputs
- Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure (HTTPS)
- Sponsored top-level domain (sTLD)
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each county government site on our county list in Arizona. Scores come from the checks listed on standards.scangov.org. Sites were scanned between 8/18/2026 and 9/17/2026; each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage returned successfully and sent the scanner its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We weren't able to fully scan 4 sites because they did not respond, blocked the scanner, or returned no page content. They appear in the table without grades, each with its scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale, and rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, including every county's raw results, is published in the ScanGov data repository.