Alaska county websites: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 18 Alaska county websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 18
  • Last scan: 11/7/2026

F 53

Average usability score of 15 fully scanned Alaska county sites

11th

of 49 states, ranked by average usability score

15 of 18

Sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 3, so they're listed without grades

F 48

U.S. county average usability score, 2467 fully scanned sites

Alaska's state site, alaska.gov, ranks 26th of 51 state sites with a D. State rankings.

How Alaska county usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 15 fully scanned Alaska county sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 15 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Alaska average
  • U.S. county average
View the data table
How Alaska county usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 395
40 to 492
50 to 591
60 to 693
70 to 793
80 to 891
90 to 1000

Alaska counties by usability grade, compared with all U.S. counties

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Alaska: 15 sites. U.S.: 2467 sites.

  1. AlaskaB to C (70 to 89): 27% (4 sites)D to F (below 70): 73% (11 sites)
  2. All U.S. countiesA (90 to 100): 2% (39 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 16% (403 sites)D to F (below 70): 82% (2,025 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Alaska counties by usability grade, compared with all U.S. counties
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Alaska0% (0)27% (4)73% (11)
All U.S. counties2% (39)16% (403)82% (2,025)

Top 3 Alaska county sites by usability score

#1 in Alaska · U.S. rank 6

Anchorage, AK

B 81 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability F
  • Security C
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#2 in Alaska · U.S. rank 9

Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK

C 75 usability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

#2 in Alaska · U.S. rank 9

Petersburg Borough, AK

C 75 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability C
  • Security B
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

Most common usability failures among Alaska county sites

Share of the 15 fully scanned Alaska county sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to its standard and how to fix it.

  1. Open Graph image alt93% (14 of 15 sites)
  2. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)73% (11 of 15 sites)
  3. Page description73% (11 of 15 sites)
  4. First Contentful Paint (FCP)67% (10 of 15 sites)
  5. Open Graph description67% (10 of 15 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among Alaska county sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt93%14
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)73%11
Page description73%11
First Contentful Paint (FCP)67%10
Open Graph description67%10

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
  • Page description. The page has a meta description that summarizes its content for search results. Search results do not show what your page does.
  • First Contentful Paint (FCP). The page starts displaying content within 1.8 seconds. Users see blank screen and think site is broken.
  • Open Graph description. The page has a description for social media previews. Shared links have no description on social media.

All Alaska county sites by usability score

Alaska county sites ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 muni.org
Anchorage, AK U.S. rank 6
13 of 16 checks pass B
2 matsu.gov
Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK U.S. rank 9
12 of 16 checks pass C
2 petersburgak.gov
Petersburg Borough, AK U.S. rank 9
12 of 16 checks pass C
3 nwabor.org
Northwest Arctic Borough, AK U.S. rank 10
11 of 15 checks pass C
4 aleutianseast.org
Aleutians East Borough, AK U.S. rank 13
10 of 15 checks pass D
4 north-slope.org
North Slope Borough, AK U.S. rank 13
10 of 15 checks pass D
5 fnsb.gov
Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK U.S. rank 15
10 of 16 checks pass D
6 juneau.org
Juneau, AK U.S. rank 20
8 of 16 checks pass F
7 cityofsitka.com
Sitka, AK U.S. rank 22
7 of 16 checks pass F
8 bristolbayboroughak.us
Bristol Bay Borough, AK U.S. rank 24
6 of 15 checks pass F
9 borough.ketchikan.ak.us
Ketchikan Gateway Borough, AK U.S. rank 27
5 of 15 checks pass F
9 kodiakak.us
Kodiak Island Borough, AK U.S. rank 27
5 of 15 checks pass F
9 lakeandpen.com
Lake and Peninsula Borough, AK U.S. rank 27
5 of 15 checks pass F
9 wrangell.com
Wrangell, AK U.S. rank 27
5 of 15 checks pass F
10 kpb.us
Kenai Peninsula Borough, AK U.S. rank 28
5 of 16 checks pass F
hainesalaska.gov
Haines Borough, AK
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
skagway.org
Skagway, AK
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -
yakutatak.us
Yakutat, AK
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each county site on our county list in Alaska. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 9/30/2026 and 11/2/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 3 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo