Alaska county websites ranked by digital experience

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 19 Alaska county government websites across accessibility, botability, security, and usability.

  • Sites: 19
  • Last scan: 9/20/2026

C 76

Average overall score of 15 fully scanned Alaska county sites

8th

of 48 states, ranked by average overall score

15 of 19

Sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 4, so they're listed without grades

C 76

U.S. county average overall score, 2435 fully scanned sites

Alaska's state site, alaska.gov, ranks 22nd of 51 state sites with a D. State rankings.

How Alaska county overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 15 fully scanned Alaska county sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 15 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Alaska average
  • U.S. county average
View the data table
How Alaska county overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 692
70 to 798
80 to 895
90 to 1000

Alaska counties by overall grade, compared with all U.S. counties

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Alaska: 15 sites. U.S.: 2435 sites.

  1. AlaskaB to C (70 to 89): 87% (13 sites)D to F (below 70): 13% (2 sites)
  2. All U.S. countiesA (90 to 100): 4% (98 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 82% (2,007 sites)D to F (below 70): 14% (330 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Alaska counties by overall grade, compared with all U.S. counties
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Alaska0% (0)87% (13)13% (2)
All U.S. counties4% (98)82% (2,007)14% (330)

Alaska county average score by indicator, compared with all U.S. counties

Average of the 15 fully scanned Alaska county sites, score 0 to 100. U.S. average covers 2435 fully scanned county sites.

  1. Accessibility86U.S. counties: 88
  2. Botability76U.S. counties: 76
  3. Security84U.S. counties: 88
  4. Usability52U.S. counties: 49
  • Alaska
  • U.S. counties
View the data table
Alaska county average score by indicator, compared with all U.S. counties
IndicatorAlaska averageU.S. counties average
Accessibility8688
Botability7676
Security8488
Usability5249

Top 3 Alaska county sites by overall score

#1 in Alaska · U.S. rank 12

Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK

B 86 overall

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability C

#2 in Alaska · U.S. rank 14

Sitka, AK

B 84 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability F

#3 in Alaska · U.S. rank 15

Northwest Arctic Borough, AK

B 83 overall

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability B
  • Security B
  • Usability C

Most common failures by indicator

The check Alaska county sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

All Alaska county sites by overall score

Alaska county sites ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 matsu.gov
Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
B
2 cityofsitka.com
Sitka, AK U.S. rank 14
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
B
3 nwabor.org
Northwest Arctic Borough, AK U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
B
3 petersburgak.gov
Petersburg Borough, AK U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
B
4 aleutianseast.org
Aleutians East Borough, AK U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade C
B
5 fnsb.gov
Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
C
6 north-slope.org
North Slope Borough, AK U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
C
6 wrangell.com
Wrangell, AK U.S. rank 21
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
C
7 bristolbayboroughak.us
Bristol Bay Borough, AK U.S. rank 23
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
C
8 juneau.org
Juneau, AK U.S. rank 24
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
C
9 muni.org
Anchorage, AK U.S. rank 25
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
C
9 borough.ketchikan.ak.us
Ketchikan Gateway Borough, AK U.S. rank 25
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
C
10 kodiakak.us
Kodiak Island Borough, AK U.S. rank 28
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
C
11 lakeandpen.com
Lake and Peninsula Borough, AK U.S. rank 32
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade F
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
D
12 kpb.us
Kenai Peninsula Borough, AK U.S. rank 37
  • Accessibility grade D
  • Botability grade D
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
D
denaliborough.govoffice.com
Denali Borough, AK
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asked us not to. Status 998 -
hainesalaska.gov
Haines Borough, AK
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -
skagway.org
Skagway, AK
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't fully scan your site because it responded without any page content. Status 995 -
yakutatak.us
Yakutat, AK
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We couldn't scan your site because it showed our bot a captcha or browser check instead of the page. Status 996 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each county government site on our county list in Alaska. Scores come from the checks listed on standards.scangov.org. Sites were scanned between 7/19/2026 and 9/18/2026; each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage returned successfully and sent the scanner its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We weren't able to fully scan 4 sites because they did not respond, blocked the scanner, or returned no page content. They appear in the table without grades, each with its scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale, and rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, including every county's raw results, is published in the ScanGov data repository.