Showing Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites. All education sites
Members of the Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
C 73
Average readability score of 12 fully scanned Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites
7th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average readability score
12 of 12
Minnesota intercollegiate athletic conference member sites fully scanned
F 56
Average readability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference readability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 12 fully scanned Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 11 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 3 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 0 |
| 80 to 89 | 0 |
| 90 to 100 | 8 |
Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference by readability grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference: 12 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference | 67% (8) | 0% (0) | 25% (3) |
| All education sites | 53% (1,425) | 0% (0) | 41% (1,110) |
Top 3 Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites by readability score
#1 in Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 1
Carleton College
A 100 readability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability C
- Readability A
#1 in Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 1
College of Saint Benedict and Saint John's University
A 100 readability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability A
- Readability A
#1 in Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 1
Concordia College at Moorhead
A 100 readability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability B
- Readability A
What each check means
- Reading level. Page text reads at or below a 7th grade level so most users can understand it. Users struggle to understand your content.
Every education site with one problem
- Education websites that are hard to read: 1,110 of 2,535 fully scanned education sites (44%), with every site listed.
Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference members by readability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
carleton.edu
Carleton College U.S. rank 1 |
1 of 1 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
csbsju.edu
College of Saint Benedict and Saint John's University U.S. rank 1 |
1 of 1 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
concordiacollege.edu
Concordia College at Moorhead U.S. rank 1 |
1 of 1 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
gustavus.edu
Gustavus Adolphus College U.S. rank 1 |
1 of 1 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
macalester.edu
Macalester College U.S. rank 1 |
1 of 1 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
smumn.edu
Saint Mary's University of Minnesota U.S. rank 1 |
1 of 1 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
stkate.edu
St Catherine University U.S. rank 1 |
1 of 1 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
wp.stolaf.edu
St Olaf College U.S. rank 1 |
1 of 1 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
bethel.edu
Bethel University U.S. rank 4 |
0 of 1 checks pass | F |
| 4 |
hamline.edu
Hamline University U.S. rank 80 |
0 of 1 checks pass | F |
| 2 |
css.edu
The College of Saint Scholastica U.S. rank 4 |
0 of 1 checks pass | F |
| 3 |
augsburg.edu
Augsburg University U.S. rank 11 |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We were able to fully scan your site. Status 200 | - |
About readability
Write content at a reading level most users can understand.
Why it's important
Plain language helps people understand services and procedures the first time, reducing calls, errors and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your content.
Guidance
What we use to grade readability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- Automated Readability Index (ARI)
- Flesch–Kincaid readability tests
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Plain Writing Act of 2010
Standards
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.