Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference: botability rankings

Botability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 12 Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 12
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

A 92

Average botability score of 12 fully scanned Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites

6th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average botability score

12 of 12

Minnesota intercollegiate athletic conference member sites fully scanned

B 89

Average botability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference botability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 12 fully scanned Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 12 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference botability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 892
90 to 10010

Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference by botability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference: 12 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic ConferenceA (90 to 100): 83% (10 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 17% (2 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 71% (1,899 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 25% (660 sites)D to F (below 70): 5% (128 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference by botability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference83% (10)17% (2)0% (0)
All education sites71% (1,899)25% (660)5% (128)

Top 3 Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites by botability score

#1 in Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Augsburg University

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability -

#1 in Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Bethel University

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#1 in Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Carleton College

A 100 botability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

Most common botability failures among Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites

Share of the 12 fully scanned Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Sitemap in robots.txt42% (5 of 12 sites)
  2. Link text42% (5 of 12 sites)
View the data table
Most common botability failures among Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Sitemap in robots.txt42%5
Link text42%5

What each check means

  • Sitemap in robots.txt. The robots.txt file links to the sitemap. Search engines take longer to find your pages.
  • Link text. Links use descriptive text that tells users and search engines where they go. Users cannot tell where links go.

Every education site with one problem

Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference members by botability score

Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference members ranked by botability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 augsburg.edu
Augsburg University U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 bethel.edu
Bethel University U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 carleton.edu
Carleton College U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
1 css.edu
The College of Saint Scholastica U.S. rank 1
11 of 11 checks pass A
2 csbsju.edu
College of Saint Benedict and Saint John's University U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 concordiacollege.edu
Concordia College at Moorhead U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 hamline.edu
Hamline University U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 macalester.edu
Macalester College U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 smumn.edu
Saint Mary's University of Minnesota U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
2 stkate.edu
St Catherine University U.S. rank 2
10 of 11 checks pass A
3 gustavus.edu
Gustavus Adolphus College U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B
3 wp.stolaf.edu
St Olaf College U.S. rank 7
9 of 11 checks pass B

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo