Showing Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites. All education sites
Members of the Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
A 92
Average security score of 12 fully scanned Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites
2nd
of 96 conferences, ranked by average security score
12 of 12
Minnesota intercollegiate athletic conference member sites fully scanned
B 85
Average security score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference security scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 12 fully scanned Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 12 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 1 |
| 80 to 89 | 6 |
| 90 to 100 | 5 |
Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference by security grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference: 12 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference | 42% (5) | 58% (7) | 0% (0) |
| All education sites | 19% (505) | 79% (2,113) | 3% (69) |
Top 3 Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites by security score
#1 in Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 1
Bethel University
A 100 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability B
- Readability F
#1 in Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 1
College of Saint Benedict and Saint John's University
A 100 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability A
- Readability A
#1 in Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 1
Concordia College at Moorhead
A 100 security
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security A
- Usability B
- Readability A
What each check means
- Errors in the console. The page loads without JavaScript or network errors. Site may have hidden bugs that break features.
- X-Content-Type-Options. The site tells browsers not to guess the type of files it serves. Browsers might run dangerous files by mistake.
- Security.txt. The site has a security.txt file so researchers know how to report issues. Security researchers cannot report problems to you.
Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference members by security score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
bethel.edu
Bethel University U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
csbsju.edu
College of Saint Benedict and Saint John's University U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
concordiacollege.edu
Concordia College at Moorhead U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
stkate.edu
St Catherine University U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
css.edu
The College of Saint Scholastica U.S. rank 1 |
8 of 8 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
gustavus.edu
Gustavus Adolphus College U.S. rank 2 |
8 of 9 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
macalester.edu
Macalester College U.S. rank 2 |
8 of 9 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
augsburg.edu
Augsburg University U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
carleton.edu
Carleton College U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
hamline.edu
Hamline University U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
smumn.edu
Saint Mary's University of Minnesota U.S. rank 3 |
7 of 8 checks pass | B |
| 4 |
wp.stolaf.edu
St Olaf College U.S. rank 6 |
6 of 8 checks pass | C |
About security
Secure your site and protect users with proper security practices.
Why it's important
Strong defenses prevent hackers from stealing personal information and other confidential data.
Risks
- Hackers can steal private information from your site.
Guidance
What we use to grade security:
- CISA Website Security
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- CISA Cybersecurity Performance Goals
- RFC 9116
- OWASP Top 10
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
Standards
- Content security policy (CSP)
- HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)
- security.txt
- X-Content-Type-Options
- Errors in the console
- Clickjacking mitigation
- Paste preventing inputs
- Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure (HTTPS)
- Sponsored top-level domain (sTLD)
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.