Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference: website rankings

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 12 Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 12
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

A 92

Average overall score of 12 fully scanned Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites

1st

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

12 of 12

Minnesota intercollegiate athletic conference member sites fully scanned

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 12 fully scanned Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 12 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 893
90 to 1009

Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference: 12 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic ConferenceA (90 to 100): 75% (9 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 25% (3 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference75% (9)25% (3)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 12 fully scanned Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility95All education: 91
  2. Botability92All education: 89
  3. Security92All education: 85
  4. Usability84All education: 68
  5. Readability73All education: 56
  • Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference
  • All education
View the data table
Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorMinnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference averageAll education average
Accessibility9591
Botability9289
Security9285
Usability8468
Readability7356

Top 3 Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites by overall score

#1 in Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 5

Bethel University

A 96 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#1 in Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 5

College of Saint Benedict and Saint John's University

A 96 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#2 in Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference · U.S. education rank 6

Augsburg University

A 95 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability -

Most common failures by indicator

The check Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference members by overall score

Minnesota Intercollegiate Athletic Conference members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 bethel.edu
Bethel University U.S. rank 5
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
1 csbsju.edu
College of Saint Benedict and Saint John's University U.S. rank 5
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
2 augsburg.edu
Augsburg University U.S. rank 6
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade -
A
2 css.edu
The College of Saint Scholastica U.S. rank 6
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
3 concordiacollege.edu
Concordia College at Moorhead U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
3 macalester.edu
Macalester College U.S. rank 7
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
4 stkate.edu
St Catherine University U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
5 gustavus.edu
Gustavus Adolphus College U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
6 carleton.edu
Carleton College U.S. rank 10
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade C
  • Readability grade A
A
7 hamline.edu
Hamline University U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
B
7 wp.stolaf.edu
St Olaf College U.S. rank 15
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
8 smumn.edu
Saint Mary's University of Minnesota U.S. rank 19
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo