Showing Missouri Valley Conference member sites. All education sites
Members of the Missouri Valley Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
C 75
Average readability score of 9 fully scanned Missouri Valley Conference member sites
6th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average readability score
9 of 9
Missouri valley conference member sites fully scanned
F 56
Average readability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Missouri Valley Conference readability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 9 fully scanned Missouri Valley Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 8 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Missouri Valley Conference average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 2 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 0 |
| 50 to 59 | 0 |
| 60 to 69 | 0 |
| 70 to 79 | 0 |
| 80 to 89 | 0 |
| 90 to 100 | 6 |
Missouri Valley Conference by readability grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Missouri Valley Conference: 9 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Missouri Valley Conference | 67% (6) | 0% (0) | 22% (2) |
| All education sites | 53% (1,425) | 0% (0) | 41% (1,110) |
Top 3 Missouri Valley Conference member sites by readability score
#1 in Missouri Valley Conference · U.S. education rank 1
Belmont University
A 100 readability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability A
- Readability A
#1 in Missouri Valley Conference · U.S. education rank 1
Bradley University
A 100 readability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability B
- Readability A
#1 in Missouri Valley Conference · U.S. education rank 1
Illinois State University
A 100 readability
- Accessibility A
- Botability C
- Security B
- Usability D
- Readability A
What each check means
- Reading level. Page text reads at or below a 7th grade level so most users can understand it. Users struggle to understand your content.
Every education site with one problem
- Education websites that are hard to read: 1,110 of 2,535 fully scanned education sites (44%), with every site listed.
Missouri Valley Conference members by readability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
belmont.edu
Belmont University U.S. rank 1 |
1 of 1 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
bradley.edu
Bradley University U.S. rank 1 |
1 of 1 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
illinoisstate.edu
Illinois State University U.S. rank 1 |
1 of 1 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
murraystate.edu
Murray State University U.S. rank 1 |
1 of 1 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
evansville.edu
University of Evansville U.S. rank 1 |
1 of 1 checks pass | A |
| 1 |
valpo.edu
Valparaiso University U.S. rank 1 |
1 of 1 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
drake.edu
Drake University U.S. rank 40 |
0 of 1 checks pass | F |
| 2 |
uni.edu
University of Northern Iowa U.S. rank 48 |
0 of 1 checks pass | F |
| 3 |
uic.edu
University of Illinois Chicago U.S. rank 185 |
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We were able to fully scan your site. Status 200 | - |
About readability
Write content at a reading level most users can understand.
Why it's important
Plain language helps people understand services and procedures the first time, reducing calls, errors and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your content.
Guidance
What we use to grade readability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- Automated Readability Index (ARI)
- Flesch–Kincaid readability tests
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Plain Writing Act of 2010
Standards
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/28/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.