Showing Missouri Valley Conference member sites. All education sites
Members of the Missouri Valley Conference (NCAA Division I), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.
C 75
Average usability score of 9 fully scanned Missouri Valley Conference member sites
7th
of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score
9 of 9
Missouri valley conference member sites fully scanned
D 68
Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites
How Missouri Valley Conference usability scores are distributed
Smoothed distribution of the 9 fully scanned Missouri Valley Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.
Distribution of 9 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.
- Missouri Valley Conference average
- All education average
View the data table
| Score range | Sites |
|---|---|
| 0 to 9 | 0 |
| 10 to 19 | 0 |
| 20 to 29 | 0 |
| 30 to 39 | 0 |
| 40 to 49 | 1 |
| 50 to 59 | 1 |
| 60 to 69 | 1 |
| 70 to 79 | 1 |
| 80 to 89 | 4 |
| 90 to 100 | 1 |
Missouri Valley Conference by usability grade, compared with all education sites
Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Missouri Valley Conference: 9 sites. All education: 2687 sites.
- A (90 to 100)
- B to C (70 to 89)
- D to F (below 70)
View the data table
| Group | A (90 to 100) | B to C (70 to 89) | D to F (below 70) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Missouri Valley Conference | 11% (1) | 56% (5) | 33% (3) |
| All education sites | 11% (289) | 42% (1,124) | 47% (1,274) |
Top 3 Missouri Valley Conference member sites by usability score
#1 in Missouri Valley Conference · U.S. education rank 2
Belmont University
A 93 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security C
- Usability A
- Readability A
#2 in Missouri Valley Conference · U.S. education rank 4
Bradley University
B 87 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability B
- Readability A
#2 in Missouri Valley Conference · U.S. education rank 4
Drake University
B 87 usability
- Accessibility A
- Botability A
- Security B
- Usability B
- Readability F
What each check means
- Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
- Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
- Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS). Page content stays in place as the page loads. Users click wrong buttons by mistake.
Every education site with one problem
- Education websites missing Open Graph tags: 1,859 of 2,687 fully scanned education sites (69%), with every site listed.
Missouri Valley Conference members by usability score
| Rank | Site | Checks passed | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
belmont.edu
Belmont University U.S. rank 2 |
15 of 16 checks pass | A |
| 2 |
bradley.edu
Bradley University U.S. rank 4 |
14 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
drake.edu
Drake University U.S. rank 4 |
14 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 2 |
valpo.edu
Valparaiso University U.S. rank 4 |
14 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 3 |
murraystate.edu
Murray State University U.S. rank 9 |
13 of 16 checks pass | B |
| 4 |
uni.edu
University of Northern Iowa U.S. rank 13 |
12 of 16 checks pass | C |
| 5 |
illinoisstate.edu
Illinois State University U.S. rank 17 |
11 of 16 checks pass | D |
| 6 |
evansville.edu
University of Evansville U.S. rank 23 |
9 of 16 checks pass | F |
| 7 |
uic.edu
University of Illinois Chicago U.S. rank 27 |
7 of 16 checks pass | F |
About usability
Optimize content structure so users quickly find what they need.
Why it's important
Well-written pages help people understand laws, services, and procedures without confusion, reducing calls and office visits.
Risks
- Users cannot understand your information.
Guidance
What we use to grade usability:
- 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (IDEA)
- U.S. Federal Website Standards
- Google Search Central
- Web Vitals / Core Web Vitals
- Open Graph
Standards
- Page title
- Page description
- Viewport meta tag
- www resolution
- Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)
- First Contentful Paint (FCP)
- Interaction to Next Paint (INP)
- Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)
- Time to First Byte (TTFB)
- Open Graph site name
- Open Graph type
- Open Graph title
- Open Graph description
- Open Graph URL
- Open Graph image
- Open Graph image alt
Grades/scores
ScanGov
About this ranking
About this data
ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/28/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.