Midwest Conference websites: readability rankings

Readability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 10 Midwest Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 10
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Midwest Conference (NCAA Division III), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

F 56

Average readability score of 10 fully scanned Midwest Conference member sites

18th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average readability score

10 of 10

Midwest conference member sites fully scanned

F 56

Average readability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Midwest Conference readability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 10 fully scanned Midwest Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 9 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Midwest Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Midwest Conference readability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 94
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 890
90 to 1005

Midwest Conference by readability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Midwest Conference: 10 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Midwest ConferenceA (90 to 100): 50% (5 sites)D to F (below 70): 40% (4 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 53% (1,425 sites)D to F (below 70): 41% (1,110 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Midwest Conference by readability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Midwest Conference50% (5)0% (0)40% (4)
All education sites53% (1,425)0% (0)41% (1,110)

Top 3 Midwest Conference member sites by readability score

#1 in Midwest Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Grinnell College

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

#1 in Midwest Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Knox College

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#1 in Midwest Conference · U.S. education rank 1

Luther College

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability C
  • Readability A

Most common readability failures among Midwest Conference member sites

Share of the 10 fully scanned Midwest Conference member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Reading level40% (4 of 10 sites)
View the data table
Most common readability failures among Midwest Conference member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Reading level40%4

What each check means

  • Reading level. Page text reads at or below a 7th grade level so most users can understand it. Users struggle to understand your content.

Every education site with one problem

Midwest Conference members by readability score

Midwest Conference members ranked by readability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 grinnell.edu
Grinnell College U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 knox.edu
Knox College U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 luther.edu
Luther College U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 monmouthcollege.edu
Monmouth College U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 ripon.edu
Ripon College U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
2 beloit.edu
Beloit College U.S. rank 38
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 ic.edu
Illinois College U.S. rank 126
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 lakeforest.edu
Lake Forest College U.S. rank 184
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 lawrence.edu
Lawrence University U.S. rank 16
0 of 1 checks pass F
3 cornellcollege.edu
Cornell College U.S. rank 255
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We were able to fully scan your site. Status 200 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo