Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association: website rankings

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 11 Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 11
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 85

Average overall score of 10 fully scanned Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites

7th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

10 of 11

Central intercollegiate athletic association member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 10 fully scanned Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 10 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 793
80 to 892
90 to 1005

Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association: 10 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Central Intercollegiate Athletic AssociationA (90 to 100): 50% (5 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 50% (5 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association50% (5)50% (5)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 10 fully scanned Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility91All education: 91
  2. Botability91All education: 89
  3. Security88All education: 85
  4. Usability68All education: 68
  5. Readability33All education: 56
  • Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association
  • All education
View the data table
Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorCentral Intercollegiate Athletic Association averageAll education average
Accessibility9191
Botability9189
Security8885
Usability6868
Readability3356

Top 3 Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites by overall score

#1 in Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 6

Bowie State University

A 95 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#2 in Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 8

Elizabeth City State University

A 93 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#3 in Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 9

Claflin University

A 92 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

Most common failures by indicator

The check Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association members by overall score

Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 bowiestate.edu
Bowie State University U.S. rank 6
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
2 ecsu.edu
Elizabeth City State University U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
3 claflin.edu
Claflin University U.S. rank 9
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
4 bluefieldstate.edu
Bluefield State University U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade F
A
4 vsu.edu
Virginia State University U.S. rank 11
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade F
A
5 lincoln.edu
Lincoln University U.S. rank 18
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
6 wssu.edu
Winston-Salem State University U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade A
B
7 jcsu.edu
Johnson C Smith University U.S. rank 23
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
8 vuu.edu
Virginia Union University U.S. rank 29
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade C
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade -
C
9 uncfsu.edu
Fayetteville State University U.S. rank 30
  • Accessibility grade C
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
C
livingstone.edu
Livingstone College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo