Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference: website rankings

Rankings, grades, and the most common failures for 9 Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 9
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

B 87

Average overall score of 8 fully scanned Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference member sites

5th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average overall score

8 of 9

Central atlantic collegiate conference member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

B 85

Average overall score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference overall scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 8 fully scanned Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 8 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference overall scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 896
90 to 1002

Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference: 8 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Central Atlantic Collegiate ConferenceA (90 to 100): 25% (2 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 75% (6 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 25% (659 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 73% (1,965 sites)D to F (below 70): 2% (63 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference by overall grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference25% (2)75% (6)0% (0)
All education sites25% (659)73% (1,965)2% (63)

Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites

Average of the 8 fully scanned Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference member sites, score 0 to 100. The comparison covers 2687 fully scanned education sites.

  1. Accessibility91All education: 91
  2. Botability93All education: 89
  3. Security84All education: 85
  4. Usability72All education: 68
  5. Readability63All education: 56
  • Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference
  • All education
View the data table
Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference average score by indicator, compared with all education sites
IndicatorCentral Atlantic Collegiate Conference averageAll education average
Accessibility9191
Botability9389
Security8485
Usability7268
Readability6356

Top 3 Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference member sites by overall score

#1 in Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference · U.S. education rank 8

Chestnut Hill College

A 93 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#1 in Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference · U.S. education rank 8

Goldey-Beacom College

A 93 overall

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

#2 in Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference · U.S. education rank 12

Georgian Court University

B 89 overall

  • Accessibility B
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability A
  • Readability A

Most common failures by indicator

The check Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference member sites fail most often in each indicator. Each indicator page lists the top five.

Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference members by overall score

Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference members ranked by overall score
Rank Site Indicator grades Grade
1 chc.edu
Chestnut Hill College U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
A
1 gbc.edu
Goldey-Beacom College U.S. rank 8
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
A
2 georgian.edu
Georgian Court University U.S. rank 12
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade B
  • Usability grade A
  • Readability grade A
B
3 felician.edu
Felician University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade B
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade B
  • Readability grade A
B
3 holyfamily.edu
Holy Family University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade B
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade D
  • Readability grade A
B
3 jefferson.edu
Thomas Jefferson University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade A
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
3 wilmu.edu
Wilmington University U.S. rank 17
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
4 bridgeport.edu
University of Bridgeport U.S. rank 20
  • Accessibility grade A
  • Botability grade A
  • Security grade C
  • Usability grade F
  • Readability grade F
B
caldwell.edu
Caldwell University
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We didn't scan your site because its robots.txt asks crawlers to wait longer than we can. Status 997 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 11/7/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo