Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association: readability rankings

Readability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 11 Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 11
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

F 33

Average readability score of 10 fully scanned Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites

29th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average readability score

10 of 11

Central intercollegiate athletic association member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

F 56

Average readability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association readability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 10 fully scanned Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 9 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association readability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 96
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 390
40 to 490
50 to 590
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 890
90 to 1003

Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association by readability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association: 10 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Central Intercollegiate Athletic AssociationA (90 to 100): 30% (3 sites)D to F (below 70): 60% (6 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 53% (1,425 sites)D to F (below 70): 41% (1,110 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association by readability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association30% (3)0% (0)60% (6)
All education sites53% (1,425)0% (0)41% (1,110)

Top 3 Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites by readability score

#1 in Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 1

Bowie State University

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#1 in Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 1

Elizabeth City State University

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

#1 in Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 1

Winston-Salem State University

A 100 readability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability F
  • Readability A

Most common readability failures among Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites

Share of the 10 fully scanned Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Reading level60% (6 of 10 sites)
View the data table
Most common readability failures among Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Reading level60%6

What each check means

  • Reading level. Page text reads at or below a 7th grade level so most users can understand it. Users struggle to understand your content.

Every education site with one problem

Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association members by readability score

Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association members ranked by readability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 bowiestate.edu
Bowie State University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 ecsu.edu
Elizabeth City State University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
1 wssu.edu
Winston-Salem State University U.S. rank 1
1 of 1 checks pass A
2 bluefieldstate.edu
Bluefield State University U.S. rank 40
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 claflin.edu
Claflin University U.S. rank 24
0 of 1 checks pass F
4 uncfsu.edu
Fayetteville State University U.S. rank 228
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 jcsu.edu
Johnson C Smith University U.S. rank 184
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 lincoln.edu
Lincoln University U.S. rank 112
0 of 1 checks pass F
2 vsu.edu
Virginia State University U.S. rank 40
0 of 1 checks pass F
livingstone.edu
Livingstone College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 -
3 vuu.edu
Virginia Union University U.S. rank 225
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We were able to fully scan your site. Status 200 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo