Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association: usability rankings

Usability scores, grades, and the most common failures for 11 Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association member websites, from ScanGov homepage scans.

  • Sites: 11
  • Last scan: 11/8/2026

Members of the Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association (NCAA Division II), from the NCAA membership directory. Conferences change membership every year; this list follows the directory's current academic year.

D 68

Average usability score of 10 fully scanned Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites

14th

of 96 conferences, ranked by average usability score

10 of 11

Central intercollegiate athletic association member sites fully scanned. We couldn't fully scan 1, so they're listed without grades

D 68

Average usability score of all 2,687 fully scanned education sites

How Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association usability scores are distributed

Smoothed distribution of the 10 fully scanned Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites, score 0 to 100. Height shows how many sites score near each value.

Distribution of 10 scores. The data table lists counts by score range.

  • Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association average
  • All education average
View the data table
How Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association usability scores are distributed
Score rangeSites
0 to 90
10 to 190
20 to 290
30 to 391
40 to 491
50 to 593
60 to 690
70 to 790
80 to 894
90 to 1001

Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association by usability grade, compared with all education sites

Share of fully scanned sites in each grade band. Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association: 10 sites. All education: 2687 sites.

  1. Central Intercollegiate Athletic AssociationA (90 to 100): 10% (1 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 40% (4 sites)D to F (below 70): 50% (5 sites)
  2. All education sitesA (90 to 100): 11% (289 sites)B to C (70 to 89): 42% (1,124 sites)D to F (below 70): 47% (1,274 sites)
  • A (90 to 100)
  • B to C (70 to 89)
  • D to F (below 70)
View the data table
Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association by usability grade, compared with all education sites
GroupA (90 to 100)B to C (70 to 89)D to F (below 70)
Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association10% (1)40% (4)50% (5)
All education sites11% (289)42% (1,124)47% (1,274)

Top 3 Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites by usability score

#1 in Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 2

Virginia State University

A 93 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security C
  • Usability A
  • Readability F

#2 in Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 4

Bluefield State University

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security B
  • Usability B
  • Readability F

#2 in Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association · U.S. education rank 4

Bowie State University

B 87 usability

  • Accessibility A
  • Botability A
  • Security A
  • Usability B
  • Readability A

Most common usability failures among Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites

Share of the 10 fully scanned Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites failing each check. A site can fail more than one check. Each check links to the sites failing it, or to its standard when we have no list yet.

  1. Open Graph image alt80% (8 of 10 sites)
  2. Open Graph site name60% (6 of 10 sites)
  3. Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)50% (5 of 10 sites)
  4. Open Graph image50% (5 of 10 sites)
  5. Open Graph URL50% (5 of 10 sites)
View the data table
Most common usability failures among Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association member sites
CheckShare failingSites failing
Open Graph image alt80%8
Open Graph site name60%6
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)50%5
Open Graph image50%5
Open Graph URL50%5

What each check means

  • Open Graph image alt. The social media preview image has alt text for screen readers. Screen readers cannot describe shared images.
  • Open Graph site name. The site has a name for social media and browser display. Site name missing in social media shares.
  • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). The page's main content loads within 2.5 seconds. Users wait too long and leave your page.
  • Open Graph image. The page has a preview image for social media cards. Shared links have no image on social media.
  • Open Graph URL. The page has a canonical URL for social media sharing. Shared links may point to wrong page.

Every education site with one problem

Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association members by usability score

Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association members ranked by usability score
Rank Site Checks passed Grade
1 vsu.edu
Virginia State University U.S. rank 2
15 of 16 checks pass A
2 bluefieldstate.edu
Bluefield State University U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
2 bowiestate.edu
Bowie State University U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
2 claflin.edu
Claflin University U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
2 ecsu.edu
Elizabeth City State University U.S. rank 4
14 of 16 checks pass B
3 uncfsu.edu
Fayetteville State University U.S. rank 22
8 of 14 checks pass F
4 jcsu.edu
Johnson C Smith University U.S. rank 24
8 of 15 checks pass F
5 wssu.edu
Winston-Salem State University U.S. rank 25
8 of 16 checks pass F
6 lincoln.edu
Lincoln University U.S. rank 29
6 of 15 checks pass F
7 vuu.edu
Virginia Union University U.S. rank 31
6 of 16 checks pass F
livingstone.edu
Livingstone College
Not fully scanned, so not graded. We weren't able to fully scan your site. Status 999 -

About this data

ScanGov scans the homepage of each college and university site on our higher education list. Scores come from the checks in the ScanGov standards. Sites were scanned between 10/27/2026 and 11/8/2026. Each site's report shows its own scan date. A site counts as fully scanned when its homepage loaded and sent us its page content. Averages, grade shares, failure rates, and ranks use fully scanned sites only. We could not fully scan 1 sites. They did not respond, blocked the scanner, or sent no page content. They appear in the table without grades, with their scan status, and are left out of every figure. Grades follow the ScanGov grade scale. Rank follows the ScanGov ranking method. The full dataset, with every county's raw results, is in the ScanGov data repository.

Plans Demo